Selasa, 19 Ogos 2014

BLOG - BLOG PARTI PKR

BLOG - BLOG PARTI PKR


Anwar Ibrahim

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 07:30 PM PDT

Anwar Ibrahim


[VIDEO] Nik Aziz bersyukur Pakatan Rakyat kekal

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 03:05 AM PDT

Statement From The Dock

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 01:35 AM PDT

TMI

Published: 22 August 2011

My name is Anwar bin Ibrahim. I am the leader of the Opposition in Parliament. In the 1990s, I was the Finance Minister and Deputy Prime Minister until September 1998 when then Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir bin Mohamad sacked me after I had refused to resign. He had told me to resign or face dire consequences including criminal prosecution for alleged sexual and corruption offences. I refused and all hell broke loose. My unceremonious and grossly unjust dismissal simultaneously orchestrated with a trial by media under Mahathir's complete control triggered mass and widespread demonstrations throughout the country and launched the movement for change and reform known in our history as the Reformasi era.

After a series of show trials during which every rule in the book on evidence and criminal procedure was violated with impunity at the hands of the prosecution and the courts, I was convicted and sentenced to a total of 15 years.

THE CHARGE AGAINST ME

 

First and foremost, I categorically deny the charge against me. I want to state in no uncertain terms that I have never had any sexual relations with the complainant Mohamed Saiful. His allegation is a blatant and vicious lie and will be proved to be so.This is a vile and despicable attempt at character assassination. In this regard, let me reiterate that they can do all they want to assassinate my character and sully my reputation and threaten me with another 20 years of imprisonment but mark my words, they won't be able to cow me into submission. On the contrary, it only serves to fortify my conviction that the truth will eventually prevail. Come what may, I shall never surrender. With apologies to Jean Racine in "Phaedra":

"You know how well your tyranny favours my temperament and strengthens me to guard the honour of my reputation."

Yes indeed, I will guard it with my life if I have to. And if I may bring the message closer to home, let me quote the words of Nelson Mandela in his speech made from the dock in the famous Rivonia show trial of 1963 under the apartheid regime:

"I have fought against white domination, and I have fought against black domination. I have cherished the ideal of a democratic and free society in which all persons live together in harmony and with equal opportunities. It is an ideal which I hope to live for and to achieve. But if needs be, it is an ideal for which I am prepared to die."

Back in 1998, blindfolded and handcuffed, I was beaten senseless by the Inspector-General of Police and left to die in the lock up at the Federal Police headquarters. However, it was by the grace of God that a few of the rank and file of the police took pity on me and nursed me to recover from the near lethal blows. There was then a cover up by Gani Patail (now the Attorney-General) and Musa Hassan (the IGP at the time that I was charged in this new episode) with the full knowledge and connivance of Datuk Yusuf, the current chief prosecutor in this trial. All these personalities were linked in one way or the other with the 1998 show trial and more insidiously with the suppression of evidence in respect of the black eye scandal and attempts to pervert the course of justice. These are the same personalities who are now actively involved in the current prosecution against me. Res ipsa loquitur, as they say, but in this regard I'm not talking about negligence but rather proof of criminality in this heinous plot betraying indeed "the deep damnation" of the conspiracy.

The circumstances are compelling that I elect to make a statement from the dock. And in this statement I shall attempt my utmost to place the truth ahead of the web of lies and deceit that has been spun thus far. To quote Shakespeare:

"And let us once again assail your ears,

That are so fortified against our story…"

Which has set me from the outset of the trial to have been deprived of a level playing field and subjected to inequality of arms vis-a-vis the prosecution.

The prosecution's failure to discharge its duties professionally

1) Even though these matters are done as a matter of routine in criminal proceedings, the Prosecution has consistently refused to disclose material critical to my defence, including: (a) prosecution witness list; (b) primary hospital examination notes written by the medical examiners of the complainant at HBKL; (c) witness statements (including that of complainant); and (d) forensic samples and exhibits for independent examination and verification. All this has caused considerable prejudice to my defence and occasioned grave injustice. The only conclusion that one can reasonably draw from the prosecution's persistence in this act of perversity is that unseen hands are at work and it is certainly not the hand of God.

2) Your failure to respond during the course of the trial to several attempts by persons hostile to me to discredit me by commenting on aspects of the trial. These included whether I should provide samples of his DNA; blaming the defence for the delay of the proceedings; and reporting on matters that were the subject of a suppression order. These public comments were made either in defiance of your orders that they not be made. They were made by Umno officials and politicians, including Datuk Seri Najib orchestrated through the controlled electronic and print media, such as Utusan Malaysia, Berita Harian, the New Straits Times and TV3. The constant comments by the Prime Minister and Umno officials in the media and adverse comments on the progress of the trial were clearly calculated to influence you and illustrates the political motive behind the charge.

3) The latest act of blatant disregard occurred just last Tuesday and Wednesday over TV3 which broadcasted a pre-recorded interview with the complainant saying things which are clearly in contempt of the proceedings in respect of the trial. In particular, the audacious portrayal of himself as the victim who is a pious and God-fearing Muslim who has sworn on the Quran that he is a witness of truth.

4) But the truth is that even as the trial was in progress, the complainant who was engaged to someone else was shamelessly having an affair with a member of the prosecution team. Quite apart from the consequences of such an affair on the conduct of the prosecution, the complainant's facade of moral rectitude is shattered by this scandalous affair with the lady prosecutor who herself was also engaged with another man.

5) In spite of all this, the complainant, assisted by the full force of the Umno propaganda machine, via their media, has gone to town to vilify me. The point is that all comments were calculated to discredit me, adversely influence the course of the proceedings and to intimidate the witnesses at the trial. In spite of all these blatant transgressions, you have persistently refused to respond to any of these acts of contemptuous behaviour.

The solemn duty of a judge is not to sit mute when the law provides for a court of its own motion to issue show-cause notices against those who interfere in the administration of justice. I am reminded of the maxim Judex Habere Debet Duos Sales, Salem Sapicutiae, Ne Sit Insipidus, Et Salem Conscientiea, Ne Sit Diabolous, the English translation of which is,

"A judge should have two salts, the salt of wisdom, lest he be insipid; and the salt of conscience, lest he be devilish".

The office of a judge is one of the most honourable in the country; he is the voice of the legislator and the organ for dispensing justice; he holds the balance between the executive and the subject.

Even more significantly, in the discharge of his duties, the judge should be mindful of Allah's command:

"…and let not hatred of others

Swerve you into error

And depart from justice.

Be just, that is nearer to piety

Fear Allah, For Allah is

well acquainted with all that you do" — Surah al-maidah: 8

In the middle of the Second World War in 1942, Lord Atkin, in Liversidge v Anderson, had occasion to say in the House of Lords,

"It has long been one of the pillars of freedom…that the judges are no respecters of persons and stand between the subject and any attempted encroachment on his liberty by the executive, alert to see that any coercive action is justified by law."'

In my case, YA, presiding in an adversarial trial, had the residual power and the jurisdiction to have invoked YA's powers relating to contempt of court. YA chose not to do so for reasons best known to YA. What has happened is not in the best traditions of the Judiciary. In the ongoing Banting murder trial, the learned trial judge in that case, YA Datuk Akhtar Tahir, took it upon himself to summon a local television producer over a clip it aired during its prime news slot relating to the defence in the murder trial of Datuk Sosilawati Lawiya and three others. A newspaper clipping of that report is annexed herewith. YA Datuk Akhtar Tahir has courageously demonstrated judicial activism in the name of human rights and the essential requirement of a fair trial.

To compound the position to incredulity, the open scandal relating to DPP Farah Azlina Latiff having an affair with PW1 did not concern YA. This invidious relationship should have alerted YA in that I have been denied a fair trial for the simple reason that Farah Azlina Latiff would have had access to the investigation papers being a member of the prosecution's team and, therefore, PW1 would, through this relationship, would have had knowledge of the statements given by witnesses, including my alibi witnesses in the course of the investigation.

YA did not even chastise Farah Azlina Latiff for the illicit affair with SP1. All that was done was that Farah Azlina Latiff was taken off the prosecution team at the behest of the prosecution which was an open confirmation of the existence of that illicit affair. Farah Azlina Latiff did not deny the allegations against her. Neither was PW1 recalled by the prosecution to deny the existence of this unsavoury affair.

The Attorney-General had publicly stated the reasons would be given later to account for the sordid affair. That has yet to eventuate.

Yet, in the face of this, YA, at the close of the prosecution case, made a finding that PW1 was a truthful witness from this passage in the judgment as follows,

"Nothing came out from the lengthy cross-examination of PW1 or from the evidence of other prosecution's witnesses that could suggest what PW1 had told in his evidence was something which was not probable. I find PW1's evidence remains intact. He had truthfully and without embellishment or exaggeration in his evidence narrated in minute detail how he was sodomised by the accused on the date and at the place stated in the charge. I find him to be truthful witness and his evidence is reliable and if accepted would establish all the facts required to prove the charge against the accused."

My lawyers had clearly made the submission that YA had made a prejudgment when YA ought to have only made findings as to who was telling the truth at the conclusion of the defence, in which event, I would have given evidence under oath. My lawyers did not, at any time, advert to the passage above in isolation. They zeroed in on the obvious, namely, whether a witness was truthful or not had to be decided at the close of the defence case. The provisions of section 182A(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code provided the judge with that guidance but to no avail. That section bears repeating. It states:

"At the conclusion of the trial, the court shall consider all the evidence adduced before it and shall decide whether the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt."

Pursuant to what I have stated above, I have been denied the benefit of putting up my defence under oath. That amounts to deprivation of a fair trial and the existence of a level playing field.

The Court of Appeal going out of line

My appeal to the Court of Appeal over the recusal of YA on account of prejudgment, following which would have resulted in biasness was heard on July 6, 2011. A copy of the order is annexed herewith. No written judgment was handed down by the Court of Appeal on July 6. The appeal was dismissed summarily on the preliminary objection taken by the prosecution that the order appealed against was not a final order. Those were the reasons given in open court. Nothing more, nothing less. The Court of Appeal took no more than five minutes to dispose of the appeal.

Unbeknownst to me or my lawyers, there was at the same time a 40-page judgment under the hand of YA Datuk Haji Abdul Malik bin Haji Ishak, also dated July 6, 2011. A copy of that judgment is annexed herewith.

Why did the Court of Appeal not read out the 91 paragraphed grounds of judgment dated July 6 on July 6 itself? Obviously, this judgment was at hand on July 6 but had surreptitiously been concealed from my knowledge and the knowledge of the public. The letter dated August 11, 2011 supplying a copy of this judgment to my lawyers is annexed herewith. As is usual, YA must have had the benefit of reading this judgment which will further exacerbate your bias against me. The judgment is an open and flagrant attack on me to which I will advert in due course. Suffice to say at this juncture that here is a judgment of the Court of Appeal written after July 6, 2011 which contains harsh criticism against me without my being given the opportunity to reply.

But that begs the question: the appeal had been dismissed in limine on the ground that the order appealed against was not a final order. That should have been the end of the matter because it followed that the court had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. [YA Datuk Haji Abdul Malik bin Haji Ishak sat mute during the course of submissions on the preliminary objection]. The matter did not go beyond into the merits. That is what the Court of Appeal announced on July 6 without going an inch further. The preliminary objection is adverted to, not as the main part of the judgment. The major part of the judgment goes beyond. It is a frolic of his own used for the purpose of hitting out at me.

If that was so, why did Datuk Haji Abdul Malik bin Haji Ishak embark upon a relentless attack on me in the rest of the judgment? In fact, he had no jurisdiction to do so. This is a blatant abuse of judicial power, perhaps in a surreptitious attempt to curry favour the political masters? Otherwise, how else can one explain as to why he embarked upon such a scurrilous attack on me by stating in the following paragraphs as numbered:

"[5] This case will fall in history. It will be chronicled as the only known case in our country or for that matter within the Commonwealth enclave where the appellant as an accused person persistently and consistently filed one application after another in an attempt to recuse the learned trial judge from hearing and continuing to hear the sodomy trial which is ongoing.

"[6] It seems that the appellant here is trying his level best to scuttle his sodomy trial for reasons best known to him, much to the chagrin of the prosecution and the exasperation of the members of the public at large.

"[15] It was certainly an uncalled for criticism [against the learned judge] bent to deceive and confuse the uninitiated. It is easy to criticise but it is always difficult to justify it.

"[18] It is also difficult for us to accept that the Notice of Motion was filed out of a genuine belief that the learned trial judge had been biased against the appellant.

"[49] The charge graphically described what the appellant did to Mohd Saiful Bukhari Bin Azlan [PW1.] [It is elementary that it is the evidence, not the charge, which proves an offence].

"[50] The trial was unduly prolonged. It received wide media coverage.

"[56] After such a fine display of judicial impropriety, Y.A. Datuk Haji Abdul Malik bin Haji Ishak now has audacity to patronise us about a sound judicial system by stating, in what sounds like a broken symbol, as follows:

"The perquisites of a sound judicial system are independence and impartiality. For an effective and a strong judicial system, the impartiality of its judges is of paramount importance. But it cannot be denied that the public's confidence in the judicial system is shaped and moulded more by appearances."

YA Datuk Haji Abdul Malik bin Haji Ishak rather ungraciously, and without jurisdiction, took a swipe at the judgment of his brother judges of the Court of Appeal including Richard Malanjum, now Chief Judge (Sabah and Sarawak), with the obvious purpose of humiliating them when stating:

"[72] Rowstead did not consider the 'real danger of bias' test in determining whether the learned JC should have recused himself notwithstanding the Federal Court had earlier on applied the said test in:

(a) Majlis Perbandaran Pulau Pinang v Syarikat Bekerjasama-sama Serbaguna Sungai Gelugor dengan Tanggungan [1999] 3 MLJ 1, FC; and

(b) Mohamed Ezam bin Mohd Nor & Ors v Ketua Polis Negara [2002] 1 MLJ 321, FC

"[73] Consequently, Rowstead's suggestion that the request for recusal to be heard by another judge is quite radical. We categorically say that the recusal request, like the present matter, was rightly heard at the first instance by the learned trial judge and followed by this court.

"[74] Rowstead did not consider nor ventilate on section 3 of the CJA read with section 50(1)(a) of the CJA and the Explanatory Statement thereto.

"[75] The recusal application housed in the Notice of Motion concerned a long protracted trial that saw the legal manoeuvrings activated by the appellant at every nook and corner in an attempt to scuttle the criminal trial of the appellant for an offence of sodomising PW1. It is the mother of all trials in Malaysia."

[I had every right to exhaust all legal remedies open to me. No attempt has been made by anyone, or any quarter, to prevent me from doing so by seeking an order to declare me a vexatious litigant].

As alluded to earlier in this statement, YA would have had the advantage of reading this judgment after it was distributed by letter dated August 11, 2011. This, in effect, amounts to placing, by YA Datuk Haji Abdul Malik bin Haji Ishak, alleged bad character evidence on my behalf.

In view of this, how can I get a fair trial or even the semblance of one before the trial judge now who has been further put in a position to compound biasness against me?

How can I possibly give evidence under oath when the DPP has, in his possession, the same judgment which could be used against me in cross-examination? YA cannot be disabused of what has been fed to YA by YA Datuk Haji Abdul Malik bin Haji Ishak when delivering a judgment dated July 6, 2011 which obviously, having regard to the length thereof, must have been prepared well before July 6, 2011.

This is scandalous.

Then again, why wasn't the judgment which, even if written after midnight on July 5, 2011 read out in open court so that I could counter and demolish all the allegations made against me by YA Datuk Haji Abdul Malik Bin Haji Ishak?

It is elementary no one should be condemned, unheard. This is axiomatic. As far back as August 12, 1999 the Federal Court, the highest court in the land, in Insas Bhd and Anor v Ayer Molek Rubber Company Bhd and others had occasion, after adverting to the authorities on the position to rule,

"The offensive remarks made by the Court of Appeal against the High Court, the applicants and their counsel ought to be expunged from the judgment of the Court of Appeal, as it had a tendency to bring the whole administration of law and order into disrepute. Judicial pronouncements should be judicial in nature and should not depart from sobriety, moderation, and reserve. It also should not display emotion and intemperance, as displayed in the judgment of the Court of Appeal."

Adverting to an Indian Supreme Court case of State of Uttar Pradesh v Mohd Naim, the Federal Court had occasion to adopt what was said there as follows;

"If there is one principle of cardinal importance in the administration of justice, it is this: the proper freedom and independence of judges and magistrates must be maintained and they must be allowed to perform their functions freely and fearlessly and without undue interference by anybody, even by this court. At the same time it is equally necessary that in expressing their opinions, judges and magistrates must be guided by considerations of justice, fair play and restraint. It is not infrequent that sweeping generalizations defeat the very purpose for which they are made. It has been judicially recognised that in the matter of making disparaging remarks against persons or authorities whose conduct comes into consideration before courts of law in cases to be decided by them, it is relevant to consider: (a) whether the part whose conduct is in question is before the court or has an opportunity of explaining or defending himself; (b) whether there is evidence on record bearing on that conduct justifying the remarks; and (c) whether it is necessary for the decision of the case, as an integral part thereof, to animadvert on conduct. It has also been recognised that judicial pronouncements must be judicial in nature, and should not normally depart from sobriety, moderation and reserve."

In Insas, the Federal Court adopted what was said in AM Mathur v Pramod Kumar Gupta & Ors when dismissing an apparently unsustainable review petition which had certain derogatory remarks against AM Mathur, a senior advocate and also the ex-Advocate General of the State. The Court had occasion to hold,

"Judicial restraint and discipline are as necessary to the orderly administration of justice as they are to the effectiveness of the army. The duty of restraint, this humility of function should be a constant theme of our judges. This quality in decision-making is as much necessary for judges to command respect as to protect the independence of the judiciary. Judicial restraint in this regard might be better called judicial respect, that is, respect by the judiciary. Respect to those who come before the court as well as to other co-ordinate branches of the State, the executive and the legislature. There must be mutual respect. When these qualities fail or when litigants and public believe that the judge has failed in these qualities, it will be neither good for the judge nor for the judicial process. The Judge's Bench is a seat of power. Not only do judges have power to make binding decisions, their decisions legitimate the use of power by other officials. The judges have the absolute and unchallengeable control of the court domain. But they cannot misuse their authority by intemperate comments, undignified banter of scathing criticism of counsel, parties or witnesses. We concede that the court had the inherent power to act freely upon its own conviction on any matter coming before it for adjudication, but it is a general principle of the highest importance to the proper administration of justice that derogatory remarks ought not to be made against persons or authorities whose conduct comes into consideration unless it is absolutely necessary for the decision of the case to animadvert on their conduct."

Chief Justice of India, Bhagwati, in State of Madya Pradesh & Ors v Nandlal & Ors, in expressing his strong disapproval of the strictures made by the judge, stated:

"We may observe in conclusion that judges should not use strong and carping language while criticising the conduct of parties or their witnesses. They must act with sobriety, moderation and restraint. They must have the humility to recognise that they are not infallible and any harsh and disparaging strictures passed by them against any party may be mistaken and unjustified and if so, they may do considerable harm and mischief and result in injustice. Here, in the present case, the observations made and strictures passed by BM Lal J were totally unjustified and unwarranted and they ought not to have been made."

How could I under these circumstances give evidence under oath?

YA, when making the order for the witnesses offered to the defence for interview in court, gave a lifeline to the witnesses in stating in open court that they could refuse to be interviewed. YA did not in doing so evenly handle the scales of justice. YA created and perpetuated an imbalance unbecoming anyone holding the mantle of justice. In fact, the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak, and his wife, Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor, former Inspector-General of Police, Tan Sri Musa Hassan, and SAC Datuk Rodhwan Ismail who featured prominently in the evidence of PW1 came to the interview room echoing similar protests namely, "We are not prepared to be interviewed" with the Prime Minister saying YA suggested this could be done. These were material witnesses compelling the defence now to resort to causing subpoenas to be issued for their presence.

YA has created a position under which I cannot give evidence under oath. I say, with all the force at my command, that I would have been prepared and willing to give evidence under oath but for the handicaps foisted on me, in the manner YA has conducted the trial and in the manner in which the Court of Appeal judgment dated July 6, 2011 would have come to the notice of YA with regard to what I have stated herein before.

My trial is an adversarial one and YA ought not to have descended into the arena by suggesting witnesses offered to the defence could deny to be interviewed. It did not come within the province of YA to do so.

My alibi witnesses made known to the prosecution were in fact included in the prosecution list of witnesses which was not supplied to my lawyers. They were defence alibi witnesses. I am informed this is the first time this has been done.

In fact, the owner of the unit 11-5-2, Haji Hasanuddin bin Abd Hamid, had been harassed by the police for a total of 30 hours in the recording of his statements which were all video recorded. This was obvious when he was interviewed by the defence lawyers in my presence. The police investigation has scuttled my defence.

To make a mockery of the situation, the prosecution offered at the close of their case an alibi witness named, Fitria binti Dipan, who by their own admission cannot be traced.

THE COMPLAINANT'S ALLEGATIONS ARE PURE FABRICATION

As I have said at the outset, I categorically deny the allegations made against me by the complainant.

The complainant stated in evidence on June 26, 2008 he arrived at Kondominium Desa Damansara at 2.45pm to discuss work matters and hand over documents given to him by one Ibrahim Yaakob [my Chief of Staff] to myself. He says he stopped his van at the security post and mentioned the code name "Mokhtar" to the guards at the condominium before being allowed in. He parked his vehicle and took the lift to Unit 11-5-1 where I was allegedly seated at a dining table in the living room. He says he sat down at the same table and started the discussion. He told the court of the crude manner in which I had allegedly asked for sex.

The following appears in his evidence thereafter (as attached).

When questioned, he answered that he was angry and scared and that he was not prepared to do it but purportedly because I had appeared angry, he eventually obliged. It has to be observed at this stage the complainant could have, on his own admission in examination-in-chief, left the room as there is no evidence of any attempt by me to latch the door from inside.

He had further alleged that he was ordered into the bedroom and that he did enter out of fear. Even at this stage, the complainant had the opportunity to leave the living room. He did not do so. The rest of the evidence in this regard clearly showed that the complainant had every opportunity on every occasion to flee but he did not do so. His reason was that he was petrified by fear. But such a reason flies against the facts. Here is a man in his early twenties, a six-footer, physically fit and robust and with powerful connections in the top police brass as well as the political elite with access to the very inner sanctum of power. Additionally, he has also been a key Umno student operative, having undergone the rigorous training conducted by the Biro Tata Negara of the Prime Minister's Department. And here I was a 60-year-old man with a history of back injury who had undergone a major back surgery holding no position of power. If indeed I could have exercised any kind of undue influence or mental pressure on him, this could have been easily neutralised by a quick phone call to his connections. As regards the fear of physical harm, it would take a great stretch of the imagination to suggest that I could pose any physical harm to him.

Under cross-examination, the following significant evidence was elicited from the complainant. He admitted that he had brought along lubricant and had himself voluntarily and without hesitation applied it. He claimed that carnal intercourse took place and that it was painful and coarse. However, this was clearly not borne out in the medical evidence in the prosecution case suggesting fissures or tears. After the alleged act, he testified that he had a drink and engaged in a friendly conversation with me. Startlingly, no attempt was made by the complainant to seek immediate medical attention. Instead, he attended a PKR function the following day. In the evening, he joined a meeting of the Anwar Ibrahim Club at my house without showing any sign of either emotional or physical discomfort let alone trauma. On the contrary, he was going about matters in a calm and confident manner. His conduct therefore is totally inconsistent with having been violated. In any event, he neither made a police report nor sought medical attention, notwithstanding that two days prior to the alleged act, he had met with Najib and Rosmah as well having talked on the phone with Musa Hassan and met with Rodhwan at a hotel.

It is obvious, from the evidence above, that the complainant was lying through his teeth although YA, despite the compelling evidence to the contrary, found him a truthful witness at the close of the prosecution case. This defies logic, let alone the law.

Then again, the expert evidence with regard to DNA led in the course of prosecution case through PW4, Dr Seah Lay Hong, and PW5, Nor Aidora Saedon, was highly questionable in that crucial information pertaining to the DNA analysis of both the said witnesses which they were obliged to furnish to the court was suspiciously withheld despite them confirming the existence of such information. The real possibility that the samples analysed were contaminated and even planted were completely disregarded despite such possibilities coming clearly within guidelines set by the international forensic community which were completely ignored, if not, blatantly disregarded by PW4 and PW5 to fit the prosecution's case. It is obvious had the said possibilities been explored, the conclusions reached would have been very different in that the complainant's own semen was found in his own anus, there was ample evidence of contributors other than Male Y around the complainant's perianal, lower and higher rectal region and there was clear evidence of the samples having been tampered with before they were sent for analysis. In such circumstances, the integrity of the said samples was surely compromised. Furthermore, the impartiality of PW4 was highly questionable having regard to the way in which she completely dismissed the very high possibility that the samples sent to her would have degraded to a certain degree by the time they reached her which such degradation was completely absent from all samples in this case. This clearly points to the obvious reality that the samples sent for analysis could not have been what were extracted from the complainant's person.

Trial within a trial

The Gestapo-like manner in which I was arrested and the subsequent detention and interrogation by the police all betrayed the hands of the political masters at work. What was the need to send in balaclava-clad commandos to effect the arrest if not to attempt to flex political muscle and to display pure vindictiveness? These startling facts were completely ignored by YA.

YA had made an earlier ruling to exclude the recovery of certain items including water bottle, Good Morning towel, toothpaste from the lock-up at IPK, Kuala Lumpur where I had been detained overnight from 16.7.08 to 17.7.08. However, you reversed this ruling subsequently which is something most shocking and unprecedented.

Although in the trial within a trial, I had adverted to the role of Taufik and Supt Jude Pereira, the prosecution elected only to call Taufik in rebuttal in the trial within a trial. Taufik attempted to produce a photostat copy of the warrant of arrest which was only marked as an ID and, therefore, could not be considered as evidence in the trial within a trial. A photostat copy of a document is not admissible as evidence in a court of law. It was in the trial within a trial that primary evidence of the document ought to have been given if the original record had been lost or destroyed.

The prosecution could not, by producing the original warrant of arrest in the main trial, cure the infirmity. It is in evidence that three copies of the warrant of arrest were in the possession of Supt Jude Pereira. The evidence of the warrant of arrest was available during the trial within a trial.

Even Supt Jude Periera, whose role was adverted to by me during the trial within a trial, chose not to take the stand despite having had the opportunity to have produced the original copy of the warrant of arrest in the trial within a trial.

It was during the trial within a trial that Supt Jude Periera should have testified. It was clearly unlawful for the court to accept Supt Jude Periera's evidence in the general trial for the purpose of rebutting my evidence in the trial within a trial that the DNA profiling from the Good Morning towel, toothbrush and mineral water bottle had been obtained by unfair methods and unfair means and my arrest, therefore, had been procured unlawfully.

In fact, Supt Jude Periera's evidence in the general trial confirms that there had been non-compliance with Rule 20 of the Lock-up Rules, 1953 in that I, after my arrest on 16.7.08, had not been placed in the lock-up from 6pm to 6am the following day. The provisions of Rule 20 are mandatory.

If this was the position in our case, which it was, then, clearly, my being taken to the HKL in breach of Rule 20 reflected unfair means and unfair methods being employed by the police to obtain the DNA profiling from the items set out hereinbefore. The position is further compounded by the evidence of Supt Jude Periera in the general trial that he did not direct police personnel in charge of the lock-up not to touch the said items despite the police personnel in the general trial before the trial within a trial, clearly, saying that Supt Jude Periera had done so.

So the position comes to this, Supt Jude Periera, in his evidence on oath in the main trial, supports the defence case that unfair methods and unfair means had been used by the police to obtain DNA profiling from the items set out hereinbefore.

From the ruling made by the court to exclude the items, it is clear it was based on unfair means and unfair methods employed by the police meaning it was by trick and deception that the police attempted to introduce the DNA evidence.

In any event, from the evidence of DSP Taufik given in the trial within a trial and the general trial, the grounds of arrest could not have been given by him to me in Segambut as this is, clearly, contradicted by the evidence of S.N. Nair and myself.

The question of challenging evidence given in the main trial by DSP Taufik and Supt Jude Periera does not arise. It was the assertions made under oath by me that my arrest was unlawful and unfair methods and unfair means had been used to obtain his DNA profiling in the trial within a trial stood unchallenged by the prosecution by leading lawful evidence in rebuttal of those assertions. In fact, YA should have drawn an adverse inference against the prosecution for not having done so.

FORENSIC EVIDENCE

The prosecution case rests on the evidence of the DNA and so-called "findings of seminal fluid" or "sperm" as they claim. As a matter of fact, this is the only forensic evidence upon which the foundation of the prosecution's so-called proof rests. Yet, this foundation is erected on shaky grounds though this has not prevented them working in hand in glove with the powers that be to mount an insidious and relentless campaign to vilify me.

The fact is that there is not an iota of evidence, DNA or otherwise, that has ever been found in the premises of the alleged act, not in the wash room, bedroom, carpets or anywhere else where such evidence ought to have been found.

Supt Pereira, despite being instructed to keep the HKL samples (marked B1 to B10) in a freezer, deliberately defied the instruction of Dr Siew Sheue Fong (HKL forensic doctor) and also admitted that he was in serious breach of the IGSO (he even stated he took full and personal responsibility for breaking of the IGSO), when he deliberately kept the HKL samples in his office cabinet for about 43 hrs before delivering them to the chemist. One must not forget that the alleged act was supposed to have occurred two days prior to the said samples having been extracted. Coupled with this 43-hour delay in delivery to the chemist, it would mean that the samples were already at least 90 hours old by the time they were examined by the chemist. Undoubtedly, the samples would have totally degraded. Yet evidence by the prosecution claimed that no degradation of any consequence had occurred.

In any event, even the 43-hour delay alone would have seriously compromised the integrity of the samples in terms of its deterioration due to bacterial action. Also, by not storing the samples in the police exhibit store (which will accord access only to him), his deliberate omission of such strict rules of the IGSO has, by his very act, presented an opportunity and possibility of tampering of the samples as access to others was made easier. This was disregarded.

There are also no cogent or compelling reasons both in law and practice for Supt Jude Pereira to cut open P27 (the big tamperproof bag containing all the HKL samples which was sealed and handed over to him), ostensibly to re-mark them (B1 to B10). It is clear that this act was just a convenient excuse to get access to the individual samples which by themselves were clearly not tamperproof as they were deliberately "sealed" with ordinary and easily removable tapes and easily removable HKL paper seals.

Dr Siew Sheue Fong, as evident in court, was most reluctant to refer to his medical notes during cross examination despite being unable to remember details. During the break he was caught surreptitiously taking a sneak peek of his notes. This dishonest act of a professional doctor who ought to have conducted himself in a fair and independent manner was blatantly ignored. Many a time Dr Siew and Dr Mohd Razali Ibrahim deliberately chose not to answer pertinent questions put to them by my counsel. Instead Dr Siew and Dr Razali's evidence was accepted without reservation.

Dr Seah Lay Hong (the chemist) gave evidence that when she received the 12 HKL samples there were two samples that were marked as taken on very different dates, she testified she did nothing to seek clarification from Dr Siew . She further testified that she "gave the benefit of doubt" to Dr Siew. My lawyers submitted strenuously that such acts and/or omissions amount to a serious breach of the cardinal rules of international lab protocols and those of the Jabatan Kimia Malaysia. Despite such blatant exposures and abject failures of non observance of strict rules, Dr Seah's evidence was well received and in totality when it ought to have been jettisoned in totality for reasons of incompetence and gross negligence.

The defence evidence will show that the prosecution claim to have proof of the presence of "seminal fluid" or "sperm" is completely unfounded. In fact, this purported proof is nothing but pure fabrication, a fact which is not that unusual considering the past history of the prosecution in this regard. If they had had any such forensic evidence, they would have guarded it for dear life rather than let it being handled in such a sloppy manner.

SUMMATION

Your Lordship has failed to ensure a fair trial as demonstrated, inter alia, by the following instances:

1. Your refusal during the course of the trial to order disclosure of material critical to my defence, most of which you thought was sufficiently relevant and which fairness required that you should order it to be disclosed before the trial. Your failure to fairly and properly exercise his judicial discretion to order disclosure was not only contrary to Malaysian laws but violated the international standards expected of a modern state which purports to practice the rule of law.

2. Your refusal to act accordingly either to take cognizance or to hold to account those responsible for the flagrant acts of leaking and publishing in the media of prosecution submissions before the matter was heard in court; your utter indifference to my protestations about these transgressions has wittingly or unwittingly facilitated the conspiracy to vilify me in the court of public opinion even as the trial is in progress.

3. Your failure to order that witnesses critical to my defence attend the trial to testify, in circumstances where their involvement was patently material to the issues at trial and recorded under oath in the complainant's testimony and admitted by statements made by these witnesses to the media. These witnesses relate to the circumstances in which the complainant came to make his early complaints against me. Nothing could be more material to the credit of the complainant.

4. Your finding the complainant to be "a truthful witness" at the close of the prosecution case clearly amounted to prejudgment demonstrating in the process a clear bias against me. Consequently, you have deprived me of my constitutionally guaranteed right to a fair hearing the effect of which is to entitle me to an unconditional release with the charges levelled against me falling to the ground. Notwithstanding this, you have not only failed to order my release but have adamantly refused to recuse yourself from further presiding at the trial.

5. Your arriving at the conclusion that the complainant was a witness of truth without first hearing the evidence of the defence would render the continuation of this trial an exercise in futility. What use would there be for me to adduce evidence to show that the complainant is in fact a liar if you have already found "him to be a truthful witness" and that his evidence is reliable and conclusive and by virtue of that irrefutable? It is untenable and the law does not allow you to do what you have done.

6. Your finding that the complainant has corroborated himself by complaining to the medical doctors of sexual assault was a glaring error of law apart from it being in gross disregard of a finding of fact, that is, that the clinical finding had indicated no evidence of penetration. Additionally, your failure to question why the prosecution has for no apparent reason refused to call in the first medical officer who had examined the complainant to testify. Did it not cross your mind that this failure was prompted by the need to suppress evidence that might be unfavourable to the prosecution?

7. Your accepting without hesitation the forensic evidence as corroborative of the complainant's account in circumstances where there were obvious concerns about how those samples were obtained, labelled, stored and analysed.

CONCLUSION

This entire process is nothing but a conspiracy by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak to send me into political oblivion by attempting once again to put me behind bars. I therefore declare that I have no faith whatsoever that justice will prevail in these proceedings notwithstanding the valiant efforts made by my defence team. As I have said at the outset, this is not a criminal trial. It is a charade staged by the powers that be to put me out of action in order that they remain in power.

In 1998, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad did just that and by his Machiavellian use of all the organs of power of the State, succeeded in getting me convicted for 15 years for offences that I had never committed. Such was the tyranny and injustice done to me then. And such is the tyranny and injustice being perpetuated today.

Najib Razak is doing the same thing as his mentor did, which is to employ all means within his power through the media, the police, the Attorney-General and the judiciary in order to subvert the course of justice and to take me out of the political equation.

This relentless conviction to send me back to prison became all the more imperative because of the major victories gained by the opposition Pakatan Rakyat in the March 2008 elections. Their worst fears were confirmed when it became clear that once my legal disqualification was over I would be contesting for a parliamentary seat and if I won, would be elected leader of the opposition.

It was therefore no coincidence that this new conspiracy surfaced three months after the March 2008 victories and the formal charge against me was made just one month prior to my contesting the Permatang Pauh parliamentary seat. The sequence of events that unfolded prior to the formal charge appeared to be lifted from the plot of 1998 minus, in this latest episode, the black-eye affair and the purported victims being led into court as partners in crime. In this second episode, the conspirators have tweaked the plot to make the complainant take on the role of a helpless victim, having realised that the 1998 method of employing Stalin-like confessions and the portrayal of the alleged victims as remorseful and repentant sexual deviants were just too much for the public to believe.

Hence, during the entire examination of the complainant, the prosecution left no stone unturned in their attempt at painting the picture of a helpless, naive and innocent young man who is a witness of truth and whose testimony should be believed regardless of any evidence to the contrary. The fact is that in the entire scheme of things, the complainant, who was just a university drop out working part time helping out my chief of staff, is essentially a pawn being employed by the shady plotters to achieve their devious ends in the conspiracy. And yet it was the decision of the court after the close of the prosecution case that he indeed is a truthful witness.

The preparation entailed in this conspiracy was most elaborate and went all the way to the Prime Minister himself and his wife Rosmah Mansor both of whom by the complainant's own admission had met him in their residence where he purportedly complained of being sexually assaulted. The initial statement by Najib that he had met with the complainant merely to discuss about a scholarship was a blatant lie only to be retracted later after various exposes were made via the social media and the Internet blogs. It was obvious that neither Najib nor Rosmah would not want to be seen to be part of the conspiracy being themselves embroiled in a series of other scandals the details of which have been raised in Parliament which to date have never been categorically refuted. But the stakes in this conspiracy are so high that nothing can be left to pure chance for indeed the prospect of the Umno-led Barisan Nasional losing power to Pakatan Rakyat is becoming more real by the day.

The main thrust of the conspiracy was to fabricate this sodomy charge in order to inflict maximum damage to my character in the run-up campaign to the by-elections. Towards this end, an intense and virulent media blitz was launched concurrently with the staging of rallies and ceramahs where the focus of the debate was not on any social, economic or even political issues but purely on my person and my morality. The plotters for reasons known only to themselves became privy to information which would be used subsequently by the prosecution and went to town in an orgy of character assassination calculated no doubt to ensure a humiliating defeat for me in the polls. But Allah is great and instead of losing, I won the Permatang Pauh seat with a thumping majority of 15,000 votes.

But the zeal to consign me to political oblivion continues unabated. Najib seems to think that by destroying my political future, it would also destroy the prospects of Pakatan Rakyat ever coming to power.

Hence, nothing is spared to ensure that I will be convicted in order that the Umno-led Barisan government continues to rule.

Having regard to all the above, I now wish to state that this trial is for all intents and purposes a show trial. I say this not to mock your Lordship nor with animosity towards anyone personally but I sit before you in the dock only to speak what I know and what I believe with conviction to be the truth. And this conviction is borne by having been in public service for more than 40 years, a quarter of which was spent within the walls of incarceration in Kamunting and in Sungai Buloh. The fact remains that I was condemned to imprisonment not because of any crime that I had committed but for my political beliefs and convictions and more significantly because back in 1998 I had posed a clear and present threat to the more than two decades of autocratic rule of Mahathir.

I say it because as I've stated earlier, the court's integrity has been completely compromised and bears all the classic symptoms of a show trial where the script has been effectively written and the outcome a foregone conclusion. I say it because as a presiding judge you have demonstrated beyond the shadow of a doubt your complete lack of impartiality. I say it because you have consistently refused to recuse yourself even in the face of mounting evidence of your bias against me. I say it too because you have persistently turned a blind eye to the gross violations of protocol and procedure committed by the prosecution while at the same remaining impervious to my protestations about these blatant irregularities that would have without more alerted any impartial judge as to the malice and bad faith of the prosecution.

In the matter of the duty of a judge, the Holy Quran commands:

"And when you judge between mankind

Then you judge justly." — Surah An-Nisaa:58

The trouble with Wan Azizah is…

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 12:09 AM PDT

Malaysiakini

The people who doubt Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail's suitability as Selangor menteri besar (MB) and who claim that Malaysia is not ready to accept a woman to govern either the state, or the nation, are wrong. Step forward, the self-appointed 'First Lady of Malaysia' (FLOM), Rosmah Mansor.

In the past, many people, especially those from Umno Baru, despised the FLOM because they believe that she was masquerading as the FLOM when she was really the prime minister. Najib Abdul Razak, they said, is her proxy. So, are the critics of Wan Azizah afraid that the top echelons of political power will become too crowded with women? So, who are the groups which are sabotaging Wan Azizah?

Many people claim they want change, but when faced with opportunity for change, which is to have Wan Azizah as the MB, they develop cold feet. They fear uncharted waters. Dr Wan Azizah is not unfit to be MB, but Malaysians are afraid of change.

The trouble also lies with the indecisive politicians, in Umno Baru, BN, Pakatan and PAS, and the conservative people who want to retain our patriarchal society.

The people who currently hold the reins of power know that when Wan Azizah turns the country around, they will be in trouble. They know they will lose power, status and wealth, and be punished for their past crimes.

The men who fear a woman at the top are probably afraid that a woman will show up their weaknesses.

The rakyat is fed up with the current administration which puts in minimal effort to help uplift the lives of women. A few years ago, Najib nominated himself as the women, family and community development minister but failed to bring any meaningful changes for Malaysian women.

Najib could not even force himself to sack his predecessor for her role in the National Feedlot Corporation (NFC) scandal.  Was he afraid of what she could do to him? An honest person can never be conned. Likewise, a person who has nothing to hide does not fear the skeletons tumbling out of his closet.

Malaysians want something done about the many crimes against women – the gang rapes, the child marriages, the increase in domestic violence, the abuse of maids, sometimes by women themselves, women being infected by HIV/Aids by their husbands, women who are abandoned by their polygamous husbands, the abandoned babies and the single mothers with no lifeline.

Why are Malaysian men, principally Malay men, averse to women holding senior and important roles in society, especially in politics?

Are they afraid that women in power might behave like the wife who has discovered her husband's cheating and will curtail both his nocturnal and extracurricular activities? Will the Malay men fear that Wan Azizah may force a complete overhaul of the syariah law, in Malaysia, to gain more protection to Malay women?

'Priority to her husband's needs'?

Do Malay men have the same opinion as the vice-president of the Obedient Wives' Club (OWC), Rohaya Mohamad (left), who in 2011 said that women should be "high class whores in bed" to prevent their husbands from straying. Perkasa's Ibrahim Ali certainly thinks so. He said, "From a Muslim perspective, the wife has to drop all of this (cooking, etc). She must give priority to her husband's needs."

If only Rohaya realised the struggles of Malayan fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers, who in the early 1900s, valued education. They fought for the right of education for their daughters. They did not think that to become whores was the full extent of an education. They wanted to empower their daughters.

The trouble with Wan Azizah is that compared with other Umno Baru women, she is educated, well-travelled, sophisticated and squeaky clean; but that does not stop people from making up lies about her, like former PKR Youth secretary Lokman Nor Adam, who jumped like a frog to Umno Baru and defamed Wan Azizah with claims that she led an extravagant lifestyle and had a penchant for expensive suits.

Around the world, there are women who had to take charge of multi-million dollar enterprises when their husbands died. These women, who had previously not known how to pay an electricity bill, were able to make their companies more successful.

If they did it, why can't Wan Azizah be MB? Many of her detractors claim that she lacks experience, but is this really such an impediment? She will have an army of advisers, including economists, lawyers, security experts, bankers, academics and industrialists to assist her.

Wan Azizah may not be good at 'investing' like a former Umno Baru politician, who corralled public funds to secure the purchase of many luxury condominiums. Wan Azizah may not have the financial wizardry of one Umno Baru wife, who is able to purchase multi-million ringgit jewels and handbags, because she began saving when she was a teenager.

PAS acted like a dithering adolescent with its wishy-washy endorsement of Wan Azizah. They must learn that one can be committed to democracy and equality, and still be a true Muslim.

The opposition to Wan Azizah is not because of her sex, her educational background, or that she is Anwar's wife. She could be perfect in every way, but her detractors will always be able to find a reason for her unsuitability.

The only reason people oppose Wan Azizah is that they do not want the floodgates to be opened, for the empowerment of women. They fear the moment when Malaysians discover that Malaysian women are as good as, or better than, men, at ruling, promoting justice and equality, ensuring peace and harmony, and providing opportunities for all.

[PRESS STATEMENT] UMNO’s Attacks Upon My Lawyer Is An Orchestrated Attempt To Interfere With Fitnah 2 Appeal In Fed Court

Posted: 17 Aug 2014 09:44 PM PDT

Media Statement
For Immediate Release
18th August 2014

UMNO’s Attacks Upon My Lawyer Is An Orchestrated Attempt To Interfere With Fitnah 2 Appeal In Fed Court

On 14th August 2014, the Federal Court fixed 28 and 29th October 2014 for hearing of my appeal against the Fitnah II conviction by the Court of Appeal. This is my final legal recourse against the unjust and politically motivated Fitnah 2 conviction.

Since the fixing of the appeal dates, Umno has orchestrated the making of hundreds of police reports by Umno divisions nationwide against N Surendran, who is my lawyer in the Fitnah 2 appeal. Among others, top Umno leader Mukhriz Mahathir has publicly called upon all Umno divisions to lodge police reports, whereas Umno-owned Utusan Malaysia’s editorial has called for immediate action against my lawyer.

The excuse for this campaign of intimidation against my lawyer is that he had said in a press conference after attending case management for the appeal that the charges against me are a political conspiracy involving Prime Minister Najib Razak.

My lawyer has the right and the duty to speak of Najib’s involvement in the Fitnah 2 conspiracy to jail me. The involvement of Najib in this conspiracy was one my main defences during the trial at the High Court; and will be raised extensively in my appeal in the Federal Court on 28 and 29 October 2014.

The evidence of Najib's involvement is clear and shocking. Najib had met with the accuser Saiful on 24 June 2014, which is two days before Saiful claims the alleged incident took place.

When asked about it, Najib initially lied that only his officer met Saiful supposedly regarding a scholarship. Later, Najib changed his story and admitted meeting Saiful at his residence.

The meeting was set up by Najib’s own special officer Khairil Anas. Najib’s personal lawyer, who is now prosecuting me, Shafee Abdullah has also admitted that he was present.

Top policeman SAC Datuk Rodwan, who was involved in the Fitnah 1 conspiracy in 1998, also met Saiful the same evening of the meeting with Najib. Saiful was also in contact with then IGP Musa Hassan. Musa was deeply involved in the 1998 conspiracy as the investigating officer.

This is blatant conspiracy staring us in the face!

Ignoring all this, the court of appeal perversely decided to convict me on 7 March 2014, on the eve of the Kajang move.

Now, Umno is going all out to prevent my lawyers from even mentioning Najib’s involvement in this conspiracy.

In my statement from the dock which I read out during the trial, I have said :

"This entire process is nothing but a conspiracy by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak to send me into political oblivion by attempting once again to put me behind bars."

"Najib Razak is doing the same thing as his mentor did, which is to employ all means within his power through the media, the police, the Attorney-General and the judiciary in order to subvert the course of justice and to take me out of the political equation."

How is it a crime for my lawyer to state to the public this essential ground of my defence in the Fitnah 2 appeal?

I believe the top Umno leadership is involved in orchestrating this campaign of intimidation. The intention is to prevent me from getting a fair hearing during the appeal on 28 and 29 October, and to cover-up Najib and Umno’s role in the conspiracy.

These attacks upon my lawyer Surendran are a clear and blatant interference by Umno in the pending appeal, as it is a direct attempt to prevent the ground of conspiracy from being raised by my lawyers.

I call upon Najib and Umno to stop this interference with the legal process; there must be no pressure, direct or otherwise, upon the lawyers and the courts. If the legal process is allowed to function independently and impartially, I am confident of being acquitted. With this latest move, Umno and Najib show no sign of allowing this to happen.

ANWAR IBRAHIM

Barisan Nasional

Barisan Nasional


bumiyang

Posted: 19 Aug 2014 03:21 AM PDT

tunku

Posted: 19 Aug 2014 03:01 AM PDT

tunku


MH17: More than 16 remains to arrive in KLIA on Friday

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 11:17 PM PDT

More than 16 bodies are expected to be arriving at Kuala Lumpur International Airport on Friday as authorities have identified 28 Malaysians involved MH17 crash to date.

Defence Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein said the final number would be confirmed on Wednesday when the coordinating committee meets.

"We can finalised the proceedings for the National Day of Mourning and determine the time for the moment silence once we confirmed how many remains will return on Friday," he told a press conference following a media briefing on Tuesday.

Last week, Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin announced Friday as the National Day for Mourning.

The remains of 15 Malaysians and a Dutch will be brought back on Friday from Amsterdam.

My Criticism Was Not Meant To Ask PM To Step Down - Dr Mahathir

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 07:41 PM PDT

Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said he had no intention to ask Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak to resign but his criticism were merely meant to be a 'wake up call'.

"I did not say he (Najib) must step down, I just do not agree with a number of his policies. It is a reminder and nothing personal. Nobody dares to criticise him, so I am doing it," he told reporters after launching the Institute of Excellence For Islamic Jerusalem Studies, here today.

The former Prime Minister in his blog posting today said he had criticised Najib's administration because leaders who are not criticised would tend to believe they are doing the right thing.

He added that only when they are criticised, leaders would realise their mistakes and quickly rectify such mistakes.

Dr Mahathir said he had decided to post his criticism and comments on the blog because his criticism in the past had fallen on deaf ears.

Meanwhile, he said the setting up of the IEIJS would enlighten the understanding and academic facts of what was happening in Palestine, to the Muslim world.

"There are not many factual studies about Jerusalem by Muslim scholars. With the establishment of this institute, I hope there would be a better understanding of whatever happened there," he said.

Najib: Economic growth on right track

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 04:56 AM PDT

The Government will continue to ensure positive economic growth based on equity, with the Bumiputra economic agenda as the national agenda.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said Malaysia's economic growth in the first two quarters of this year had exceeded expectations.

"We achieved 6.2% in the first quarter and 6.4% in the second quarter.

"This positive growth is encouraged by export activities which went up to 14.2% compared to 10.8% before," he said at the launch of the Malay entrepreneurs development programme organised by the Malay Chambers of Commerce (MCC) on Monday.

Najib stressed that the growth proved that "we are on the right track".

"If we want to split the nation's wealth equally among citizens, we must have a developing economy.

"It must be done based on growth with equity," he added.

On the Bumiputra economic agenda, Najib commended the chamber for its programmes to empower Bumiputra entrepreneurs.


"I had recently met (MCC) president Datuk Syed Ali Alattas to suggest that (members) also join the National Chambers of Commerce on foreign missions to encourage economic expansion.

"The Government is supportive of the programmes to develop Malay entrepreneurs and is ready to discuss on allocation and implementation methods," he said.

Aspirasi Bangsa

Posted: 19 Aug 2014 01:38 AM PDT

Aspirasi Bangsa


sajak dari penyokong tegar pakatan

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 09:22 PM PDT

APABILA PAS SUDAH HILANG KETAYAP, JUBAH DAN LEBAI

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 07:40 PM PDT

Taipingmali (tm)

Posted: 19 Aug 2014 01:22 AM PDT

Taipingmali (tm)


Sekolah Demokrasi?

Posted: 19 Aug 2014 12:40 AM PDT

Anak-anak melayu yang lupa sejarah asal usul kini berada diaras yang membahayakan.  Mereka akan menjual negara tanpa ada rasa bersalah.






Marah kepada guru hingga sanggup bakar kereta

Posted: 19 Aug 2014 12:20 AM PDT

Apa kah punca sebenar kejadian membakar kereta milik guru ini , adakah kereta tersebut terbakar dengan sendirinya?

Kejadian berlaku tengah hari tadi di sebuah sekolah di Teluk Panglima Garang Selangor.
I



Cerita 2.
Dikatakn terbakar sendiri...cgu f6 nak b lik sbb demam cam dengi...hidupkn enjin...call ofis...minta kebenaran ofis minta naik sain borang...park sebelah bilik guru f6... Student masuk blik bg tau kete cgu vimala berasap...sya bkejar igt cgu dlm kete bkunci...penuh asap...cgu dtg dr ofis trus tbakar..



Bunga Reflesia Ditemui Di Hutan Batu Kurau

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 03:40 AM PDT

Batu Kurau sebelum ini terkenal dengan buah durian traditional yang mempunyai bau yang kuat. Kali ini kejutan dan penemuan terbaru ialau bunga Reflesia yang biasanya ditemui di hutan simpan Sabah.

Mengikut cerita pencari hasil hutan, pokok bunga gergasi atau dikenali dengan nama bunga pakma boleh ditemui di hutan sempineh yang jauh daripada kediaman manusia.

Kelmarin En Abd Manan dan rakannya pemilik teratak resort afrina dari Kampung Perak telah membuat satu aktiviti trekking pencarian Reflesia dan ianya berjaya menemuinya untuk dibuktikan kepada dunia bahawa di hutan tersebut mempunyai spesis yang jarang ditemui di dunia.

Sempineh juga terkenal dengan gunung batu kapur yang mempunyai gua kelawar, gua sanding dan batu ikan kurau. Pada 30 Ogos ini akan diadakan satu pertandingan MTB peringkat antara bangsa di situ.





Panglima Perang Cyber

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 11:42 PM PDT

Panglima Perang Cyber


Selawat Perdana 'Semarak Mahabbah' Ambang Merdeka di Tanjong Karang cc @NohOmar

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 07:04 PM PDT

Belantan

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 11:31 PM PDT

Belantan


Pas Selangor 'langgar perintah Pas Pusat', tidak iktiraf Azizah?

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 10:27 PM PDT


Meskipun pakatan pembangkang membuat keputusan menamakan Datin Seri Wan Azizah Wan Ismail sebagai Menteri Besar bagi menggantikan Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim, Pas Selangor tetap tidak mengiktiraf Presiden Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) itu.

Timbalan Pesuruhjaya I Pas negeri, Sallehen Mukhyi berkata, meskipun Jawatankuasa Pas Pusat akur dengan majlis pimpinan pakatan pembangkang menamakan Wan Azizah sebagai calon Menteri Besar, tindakan tersebut tidak boleh dianggap sebagai satu keputusan sah.

Ini kerana, jelasnya, pencalonan Wan Azizah dikatakan tidak mendapat perkenan Sultan Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah.

"Pas Selangor sebelum ini menolak Wan Azizah bukan sebab beliau wanita tetapi kita dimaklumkan pencalonan beliau tidak diperkenan Tuanku (Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah).

"Bagaimanapun, kita akur dengan keputusan pakatan pembangkang semalam untuk tetap mencalonkan beliau (Wan Azizah). Mungkin ini percubaan (untuk mendapat perkenan Sultan Selangor). Kita tengok bagaimana nanti," katanya ketika ditemui pemberita di lobi Bangunan Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah, di sini hari ini.

Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri (ADUN) Meru dari Pas, Abdul Rani Osman sebelum ini memberitahu, penolakan Wan Azizah sebagai Menteri Besar bukan disebabkan faktor gender sebaliknya ada faktor lain.

Bagaimanapun, beliau enggan mendedahkan faktor tersebut.

Sementara itu, Sallehen yang juga ADUN Sabak menjelaskan, dalam tempoh peralihan ini, beliau bersama tiga lagi ADUN Pas akan tetap meneruskan tugas sebagai Exco bagi memastikan pentadbiran negeri yang diterajui Abdul Khalid tetap berjalan lancar.

"Pentadbiran berjalan seperti biasa termasuk mesyuarat Exco mingguan pada Rabu ini. Kita tunggu sehingga Tuanku (Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah) pulang dari luar negara pada 27 Ogos ini," katanya.

Sementara itu, Pesuruhjaya Pas Selangor, Iskandar Abdul Samad berkata, pihaknya akur dengan keputusan yang dibuat oleh Mesyuarat Jawatankuasa Pas Pusat semalam.

"Semalam kita dah buat satu keputusan yang menetapkan empat perkara dan kita akan ikut keputusan itu. Apa pun yang diarahkan oleh Pas Pusat, kita akan patuhi," katanya.

Suara Politik
Belantan

Rakyat Selangor menanti 'peluru' terakhir MB Khalid?

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 09:32 AM PDT


PAS sudah membuat pendirian mencalonkan dua pemimpin kanan Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) Datin Seri Dr.Wan Azizah Wan Ismail dan Azmin Ali sebagai Menteri Besar Selangor bagi menggantikan Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim manakala PKR dan DAP pula hanya mahukan Wan Azizah sahaja.

Langkah Pas itu bermakna berakhirnya sokongan mereka kepada Abdul Khalid biarpun mereka akan terus berada dalam pentadbiran kerajaan negeri sehingga Sultan Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah pulang pada 27 Ogos nanti.

Tetapi apa lebih dinanti-nantikan oleh pelbagai pihak, apakah langkah yang akan diambil Abdul Khalid? Jika berdasarkan kepada pendirian PKR, Pas dan DAP sudah jelas, beliau sudah kehilangan sokongan majoriti di Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN).

Malah kalaupun Pas semalam membuat keputusan menyokong beliau, ia tidak akan membawa apa-apa makna kerana jumlah kerusi masih belum mencukupi untuk mempertahankan beliau.

Tambahan pula daripada 15 kerusi yang dimiliki oleh Pas ia boleh dikatakan berkurangan kepada 13 kerusi berikutan tindakan dua ADUN parti itu, Saari Sungib (Hulu Kelang) dan Hasnul Baharuddin (Morib) menyokong Wan Azizah.

Malah sokongan daripada UMNO sebanyak 12 kerusi pun tidak mampu menolong Abdul Khalid kerana keseluruhannya baru 26 kerusi (termasuk kerusi beliau).


Oleh itu mahu tidak mahu Abdul Khalid terpaksa akur dengan keputusan Pas dan perlu menghadap Sultan Selangor untuk langkah seterusnya.

Apa yang perlu diketahui `peluru akhir' masih ada di tangan Abdul Khalid iaitu membubarkan DUN, itupun jika beliau boleh meyakinkan baginda untuk berbuat demikian atas alasan pemilihan Wan Azizah atau Azmin tetap akan mencetuskan konflik politik di Selangor.

Bukanlah rahsia lagi, Wan Azizah kini sudah menjadi musuh politik Abdul Khalid kerana terlalu mendengar perancangan politik suaminya, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

Manakala pemilihan Azmin oleh Pas, ibarat gunung berapi yang memuntahkah laharnya setelah sekian lama ia membuak-buak sejak Abdul Khalid menjadi Menteri Besar pada 2008. Konflik yang tercetus kini juga dikatakan bermula daripada konflik antara kedua-dua mereka.

Sudah tentulah Abdul Khalid tidak sanggup melihat musuh-musuh politiknya itu menggantikan beliau, tetapi dalam masa sama, Abdul Khalid akan menghadapi kesukaran untuk berbuat demikian jika salah satu calon itu mendapat sokongan majoriti ADUN.

Sebab itulah, biarpun 'peluru akhir' masih di tangan Abdul Khalid, namun ia belum tentu berkesan kecuali beliau mempunyai alasan kukuh untuk memastikan 'peluru' tersebut walaupun akan mengakhiri tugasnya sebagai Menteri Besar tetapi juga turut 'mendatangkan kecederaan parah' khususnya kepada PKR dan DAP.

Namun apa yang pasti, langkah politik Abdul Khalid sepanjang isu Menteri Besar Selangor telah banyak membantu rakyat untuk mengenali hati budi pemimpin-pemimpin PKR, DAP dan Pas.

Paling penting, beliau membuktikan kepada rakyat betapa hipokritnya politik pemimpin-pemimpin pembangkang terutamanya sanggup melakukan apa sahaja demi merebut kuasa waima mempermainkan demokrasi sekalipun!

Suara Politik
Belantan

The Unspinners

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 11:31 PM PDT

The Unspinners


Padan muka TMI (dan Edge serta KETUM) kena saman!!!

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 10:30 PM PDT


Cekap Tan Sri Shafee Abdullah. Boleh ganti AG.

Projek belum dapat tapi dia dah saman dulu. Sampai ahli Majlis2 Penasihat Ekonomi sedia bantu.

Di MOF ada dua committee utk luluskan projek2. Satu bawah RM150 juta dan satu lagi yg lebih RM150 juta. Majlis Penasihat Ekonomi dikatakan berkuasa untuk luluskan mana2 projek.

Mereka dah sedia bantu disegerakan kad subsidi minyak supaya rakyat tak buang subsidi minyak. Masaalah seludup diesel dikatakan akan diselesaikan dengan lebih bersungguh2. Dengan subsidi minyak untuk rakyat dipotong, Kerajaan boleh jimatkan lagi banyak wang untuk projek2 pembangunan.

Nampaknya boleh bungkus MI dan Edge disaman RM100 juta.

Syabas Shafee.

PAS tak silap, Doc ... Malah bijak sebab sedia jadi keldai

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 08:45 PM PDT


Pandangan mungkin tak sangat dipersetujui oleh pihak lain kerana mereka kata PAS yg kini jelas adalah Parti Anwar SeMalaysia telah bertindak dengan bijak.

http://www.theantdaily.com/Main/PAS-political-maturity-starts-to-shine-in-Selangor-MB-impasse

Tulisan ini perakui bahawa tanpa PAS yang lebih berpengalaman dalam hadapi UMNO, PR boleh kalah.

PAS dikatakan bijak dapat pertahankan Pakatan Rakyat atau khususnya PKR dan DAP.

Kalau kuat, patut PAS jadi ketua.

 Hmmm .... mereka sebenarnya kata PAS bijak kerana sedia jadi kaldai.

Bila DAP PKR gagal, kaldai2 PAS sedia bantu

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 07:44 PM PDT




Semacam kaldai tunggangan, PAS yg bantu tolong kempen penerangan isu gugurkan TSKI untuk PKR yg tak dihaditi orang ramsi dsn DAP yg demo tak dapat menarik sokongan orang ramai.

Azmin tak layak MB sebab masaalah keluarga, Keluarga Zizah tiada masaalah?

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 07:48 AM PDT


AZMIN ALI ADA MASALAH, BAGAIMANA PULA WAN AZIZAH TAK ADA MASALAH?

Mesyuarat Pakatan Rakyat pada 17 Ogos 2014 membuat keputusan yang telah mencadangkan hanya Datin Seri Wan Azizah saja dicadang kepasa DYMM Sultan Selangor untuk jawatan MB

KETUM mengarahkan Azmin Ali umtuk.menarik diri dari calon MB Selangor kerana Azmin Ali mempunyai keluarga yang boleh menimbulkan masaalah seperti Umi Halfilda dan Azwan Ali.

Azmun Ali dikatakan juga sebagai tiada ketokohan dan ketegasan.

Namun begitu, jika Sultan tidak menerima Wan Azizah, pimpinan MPP telsh mendesak KETUM untuk mencadanhkan Azmin Ali sebagai MB.

Surendran kena!!!!

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 05:10 AM PDT



Makluman Media: 

Polis telah mengeluarkan waran tangkap terhadap YB N Surendran, peguam DS Anwar Ibrahim dalam kes rayuan Fitnah 2. Beliau akan dihadapkan ke mahkamah Jln Duta esok, Selasa 19hb Ogos jam 9pg di bawah Akta Hasutan kerana mengeluarkan kenyataan bahawa kes Fitnah 2 adalah satu konspirasi politik terhadap Anwar yg melibatkan DS Najib Razak.

---

Press Alert: Police have issued a warrant of arrest against N Surendran, Anwar Ibrahim's lawyer in Fitnah 2 Appeal. Surendran will be charged tomorrow, Tues 19/8, 9am for Sedition at Jalan Duta court for stating that Anwar's sodomy 2 charge is a political conspiracy involving Najib Razak.

Zuhdi dulu sokong Anwarinas, Kini baru nak kritik Mat Sabu

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 01:27 AM PDT


Pengarah Operasi Pusat Penyelidikan PAS Dr Zuhdi Marzuki meneruskan kontroversi apabila kali ini dipercayai mengkritik Timbalan Presiden PAS Mohamad Sabu kerana bersetuju dengan keputusan Pakatan Rakyat (PR) untuk hanya mencalonkan Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail sebagai calon tunggal menteri besar Selangor bagi menggantikan Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim, walaupun parti Islam itu turut menamakan Mohamed Azmin Ali.

Zuhdi sebelum ini terkenal dengan mesej WhatsApp kumpulan Ahli Jawatankuasa PAS Pusat yang terbocor dilihat mengkritik timbalan presiden PAS itu yang dikenali dengan gelaran "ayam sabung PAS."

"Ayam sabung PAS sudah menjadi ayam daging (Datuk Seri) Anwar Ibrahim dan Lim Guan Eng," tulis Zuhdi melalui akaun Facebooknya hari ini.

"PAS Pusat sudah sebulat suara mencalonkan dua pimpinan PKR. Keputusan sebulat suara ini pun tak boleh dipertahankan bila berdepan dengan PKR dan DAP.

"Paling tidak beritahu pada PKR dan DAP, kami perlu bawa balik kepada PAS Pusat keputusan PR hari ini yang hanya þ DSWA. Tak akan perkara itu pun tak boleh buat?" tulisnya di Facebook hari ini.

Sumber Whats App

Dulu zuhdìv sokomg Anwarinas dan kini buat2 hairan pulak .

Kalau nak tahu sapa orang2 Anwarinas, baca berikut:ì

Jom tengok sapa.yang nak sangat si KIPAS!!!!

Posted: 17 Aug 2014 11:30 PM PDT


Baca juga

http://www.rockybru.com.my/2014/08/sultan-wants-khalid-anwar-wants-1azizah.html?m=1

Terpusing-pusing Hadi berpusing dan dipusingkan ...

Posted: 17 Aug 2014 07:29 PM PDT


oyabun

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 11:12 PM PDT

oyabun


Sultan Selangor minta Khalid Ibrahim menghadap selepas baginda tiba di tanah air!

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 10:12 AM PDT


SHAH ALAM: Istana Selangor mengesahkan menerima surat permohonan Menteri Besar Selangor, Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim untuk mengadap Sultan bagi menjelaskan situasi politik dan kedudukannya kini.

"Permohonan beliau telah saya sembah maklum kepada DYMM Tuanku. Bagaimanapun baginda menitahkan supaya Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim menunggu sehingga baginda berangkat balik ke tanah air dalam tempoh beberapa hari lagi," kata Setiausaha Sulit kepada Sultan Selangor, Datuk Munir Bani.

Dalam masa yang sama Datuk Munir tidak pula memberitahu status surat permohonan yang dihantar Presiden PKR, Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail untuk menghadap Baginda Sultan.

Azizah baru-baru ini memberitahu beliau menghantar surat memohon mengadap Sultan Selangor kali kedua, bagi memaklumkan dirinya mendapat sokongan majoriti Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri (ADUN) Selangor.

Terdahulu Sultan Selangor menolak permohonan menghadap Wan Azizah. Majlis Pimpinan Pakatan Rakyat (MPPR) Ahad sebulat suara bersetuju untuk hanya nama Wan Azizah dicalonkan sebagai pengganti Khalid sebagai Menteri Besar Selangor.

Keputusan itu dibuat selepas PAS bermesyuarat dan menarik balik sokongan kepada Khalid. Khalid sebelum ini enggan meletakkan jawatan beliau kerana mendakwa mendapat sokongan majoriti daripada ADUN, serta telah menghadap Sultan minggu lalu bagi menjelaskan perkembangan tersebut.

Wasabi Oyabun..

Dialog Dewasa Kritik Berasa

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 11:11 PM PDT

Dialog Dewasa Kritik Berasa


KHALID SAMAD DAH PUKUL CANANG AJAK RAKYAT LAWAN SULTAN SELANGOR???

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 08:27 PM PDT


Si penderhaka Sultan ini secara tersirat telah mula menghasut dan membakar perasaan rakyat supaya membenci Sultan Selangor.

Mamat khawarij liberal ni apa nak dia herankan dengan Sultan? Kuasa Sultan dalam Majlis Agama Islam Selangor (MAIS) pun dia pertikaikan. Bukan nak minta ampun maaf tapi nak terjah istana untuk menerangkan pertikaian beliau terhadap MAIS.



Kini mamat ni cuba berdalih-dalih kononnya telah mendapat 'maklumat dalaman' dari Istana yang Sultan tolak Azizah dan mahukan Azmin sebagai MB baharu.

Semua ini bunga-bunga ke arah nak salahkan Sultan, kasi rakyat terbakar benci pada Sultan.

Persoalannya 'rakyat' yang mana satu?

Ya...rakyat kiasu tak sedar dek untung seperti di bawah ini yang banyak mengotorkan bumi Selangor dengan bisnis-bisnes haram mereka.

Bibit awal demo para pemakan babi depan pejabat SUK menolak Khalid Ibrahim. Mereka hanya berani semasa umat Islam sedang solat Jumaat. Tak lama lagi mereka mendanai demonstrasi anti sultan yang akan dikepalai oleh keldai-keldai tunggangan mereka...

KRISIS MB SELANGOR: APA HIKMAH PADA KITA...?

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 08:41 AM PDT


Kekadang geleng kepala melihat kemelut parti tongang terbalik...keluarga 69 PKR dan Pakatan Rakyat.

Mereka bersorak sorai meraikan pusingan  U-Turn pihak PAS menolak Khalid Ibrahim sebagai Menteri Besar Selangor. 

Masih belum habis mabuk ketum mereka, hatta di masjid dan surau mereka bukan beriktikaf, berzikir dan beribadah tapi berbalah mengenai krisis MB Selangor.

Memang krisis MB Selangor ini melekakan kita dengan politik dunia...

Mungkin hilang nikmat malam lailatul qadar dan puasa Ramadhan yang lalu...

Hilang simpati pada mangsa dan keluarga tragedi MH17...

Hilang simpati dan keprihatinan kita pada nasib Gaza yang ditindas oleh rakan Anwar di Israel...

Bahkan hilang nikmat Hari Raya...pertemuan keluarga menjadi perbincangan politik malah adakalanya membawa masam muka bila hal-hal keluarga dilupakan berbanding cerita politik.

Ada yang kata meloponglah UMNO dan BN untuk memulakan gagasan kerajaan perpaduan PAS-UMNO di Selangor.


Ada yang kata, PAS berjaya dipermainkan oleh Anwar dan DAP.

Tapi yang paling menarik ramai juga yang kata Tan Sri Khalid adalah Menteri Besar yang tiada tandingannya hingga UMNO Selangor pun tiada siapa yang boleh nak banding dan lawan... 

Namun kuasa dan perancangan Allah itu yang terbaik. Khalid akhirnya 'dibunuh' karier politiknya oleh partinya sendiri...bukan oleh UMNO atau BN kerana Khalid lebih mementingkan rakyat berbanding sikap nepotisme dan kronisme Anwar.   


Tak perlu UMNO dan BN bersusah payah membenam Khalid. Namun sebagai umat Islam kita bersimpati dengan nasib Khalid yang teraniaya itu.

Khalid doeulu-doeulu ditatang... kini ditendang!

Akibat Khalid diterajang dan menjadi ADUN Bebas, maka PKR dan PAS pun berpecah belah. Semuanya akibat dibuat sendiri oleh tangan Anwar. UMNO tengok jer...

Kerana Khalid juga dipecat dari PKR, maka kerusi parlimen pembangkang menyusut dari 88 kepada 87 sahaja. Sebelum ini mereka kalah di PRK Parlimen Teluk Intan. 

DAP dah kena, PKR pun terkena akibat sendiri gatai tangan. PAS pun akan kena macam nasib mereka di Kedah dulu...

Adakah Khalid akan dibayar Anwar untuk u-turn bagi mengekalkan kerusi Parlimen Bandar Tun Razak di tangan PKR...Wallahualam!  hehehe...

Bukti! Akibat Derhaka Majlis Syura, PAS Kini Dilaknat Menjadi Parti Sekular.

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 05:00 AM PDT

Hebatnya PAS sebagai parti yang memperjuangkan Islam.

Kehebatan PAS bukan terletak kepada Presiden kerana dengan ahli sendiri pun boleh diperlekehkan secara terbuka dan 'peribadi'.

Kekuatan PAS adalah kerana parti tersebut mempunyai Majlis Syura Ulama, badan tertinggi dalam parti yang dianggotai oleh ulama-ulama.

Hebatnya ulama PAS kerana satu masa dulu PAS kata UMNO melawan ulama tapi mereka angkat ulama sebagai badan yang tertinggi.

Kini semuanya tinggal sejarah, ulama PAS juga diperlekehkan oleh orang PAS sendiri.

Jom tengok apa yang berlaku bila PAS derhaka pada ulama mereka.


Aneh bukan, bagaimana sebuah parti Islam boleh silap dalam menulis bulan Islam? Tahun ini (2014) adalah tahun 1435 dan 17 Ogos bersama dengan 21 Ramadhan.

Adakah surat ini dikarang oleh DAP dan Presiden PAS hanya tukang tanda tangan?

*Lebih memalukan bila yang kantoikan perkara ini adalah blogger Cina iaitu Helen Ang (http://helenang.wordpress.com/2014/08/17/malunya-pas-sampai-tahun-hijrah-pun-dah-tak-tahu-dah/)

HADI IS RUBBISH KATA TONY PUA

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 12:34 AM PDT



[17/08 19:17] ‪+60 19-578 3100‬: [15:07, 8/17/2014] Ust Nasrudin :
Ana kecewa sgt2 hari ni. Enta cuba bayangkan drp 37 ahli mesy. hanya 10 org saja yg sokong DSHH. DSHH balik terus dan tak buat sidang media. Wajah sebenar Anwarinas kian jelas dlm PAS. PAS kini lbh takut kpd Anwar dan DAP. Jahanam PAS kalau terus begini.

[15:08, 8/17/2014] Ust Nasrudin :
Mat Sabu yg lead sidang media. Nampaknya kepimpinan PAS masih tak sedar diri lagi. Kesian kpd pendokong jemaah yg setia. Tanpa disedari perjuangan PAS kini dikhianati pimpinan sendiri

[18/08 14:52] ‪+60 19-578 3100‬: [20:07, 8/17/2014] DAP Tony Phu : Wdone our frenz. PAS following us except some. Lets do something next.

[20:08, 8/17/2014] DAP Tony Phu : So dangerous when hadi stay as president or others who not supporting us.

[20:09, 8/17/2014] DAP Tony Phu : Dont worry. Our frenz still hv a power to control them 4 this time. President is rubbish. Just standby a dustbin.

[20:11, 8/17/2014] DAP Tony Phu : Anwar order 4 the next. MS and SK is our candidate. Just work 4 that plan. We must control them and get max. power.

Kembara Politik

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 11:11 PM PDT

Kembara Politik


Bila ayam sabung bertukar jadi ayam daging, alamat tunggu masa je Pas nak kena sembelih

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 07:19 PM PDT






Krisis MB Selangor: DAP & PKR campak tolak ansur Hadi dalam longkang

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 08:18 AM PDT


Mana maruah Pas? Syor Presiden PAS, Hj Hadi Awang untuk menyertakan nama Azmin sebagai calon MB yang disokong sebulat suara AJK Pas Pusat itu pun tidak dihormati oleh Majlis Pimpinan Pakatan Rakyat.

Syor Hj Hadi dikatakan sebagai "suatu tolak ansur" seperti mana dicatat Dr Muhaimin iaitu salah seorang AJK Pas Pusat dalam mesyuarat itu semalam  pun dengan mudah dipermainkan oleh DAP dan PKR.

Di situ sahaja kita sebagai rakyat dapat menilai sejauh mana kemampuan Pas yang dikatakan cuba menjadi pengganti UMNO. Pas ternyata lemah dalam berpolitik. Cara berpolitik pas ternyata merugikan Melayu dan Islam.

Persoalannya, apakah dengan keadaan seperti ini Pas mampu meyakinkan orang Melayu Islam untuk mempertahankan perkara-perkara yang dekat dengan Melayu dan Islam yang sudah menjadi hak milik seperti diperuntukkan dalam Perlembagaan sekiranya Pakatan berjaya membentuk kerajaan pada masa akan datang?

Kesimpulannya, adalah sangat mudarat untuk menyokong dan mengundi Pas kerana Pas tidak punya upaya untuk bertegas. Jauh sekali untuk menjadi dominan dalam Pakatan Rakyat.

My Longest Yard

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 11:10 PM PDT

My Longest Yard


Segalanya sudah berubah..

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 01:28 AM PDT

Pergh...lama gila tak update blog. Rasanya dah bersawang blog ni.

Belum ada feel nak update dari masa ke semasa. Takde mood lagi.

Dulu tiap-tiap hari update. Lebih-lebih lagi kalau ada cerita politik.

Sekarang ada banyak komitmen. Kerja ..keluarga...

Hidup kita sentiasa dan perlu berubah. Tak boleh stuck di satu tempat dalam satu jangka masa yang panjang.


Bila kita mahu berubah, maka akan ada perkara lain yang perlu dikorbankan.

Sorry blog, anda jadi mangsa yang perlu dikorbankan.

Sekali sekala aku akan jenguk juga di sini.

PenangWasabi

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 09:35 PM PDT

PenangWasabi


Orang Kanan Anwar Ditahan Polis?

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 10:29 AM PDT


Ahli Parlimen Padang Serai, N. Surendran ditahan di Ibu Pejabat Polis Wangsa Maju, Jalan Pudu di sini petang ini.

Beliau yang juga Naib Presiden Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) ditahan ketika tiba di balai tersebut kira-kira pukul 7.52 petang bersama peguamnya, Lateefa Koya.

Timbalan Ketua Jabatan Siasatan Jenayah Kuala Lumpur, Asisten Komisioner Khairi Ahrasa berkata, Surendran ditahan mengikut Seksyen 4 (1) Akta Hasutan 1948.

"Bagaimanapun beliau dibebaskan dengan jaminan dan diminta hadir ke Mahkamah Jalan Duta pukul 8.30 pagi esok," katanya.

Penang Wasabi..

tok gajah

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 09:26 PM PDT

tok gajah


PAS pencacai PKR dan DAP Selangor.......?

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 09:24 PM PDT


Tok pun berase pelik juge ape bile Pakatan Rakyat bersetuju untuk menghantar kan seorang sahaje name calun untuk Menteri Besar Selangor iaitu Datuk Seri Wan Azizah menggantikan tempat Tan Seri Khalid. Yang Tok ketahui PAS dah pun bersetuju untuk menghantar due name calun  iaitu Wan Azizah dan Mohammad Azmin Ali.

Kalu lah begini gaye nye Tok nampak suare PAS dalam Pakatan Rakyat ni dah tak laku dan tak bolek pakai langsung. Pade pandangan Tok adelah lebih baik PAS ni jangan masuk campur langsung dalam hal pentadbiran negeri Selangor ni.

Tok peratikan sikap PKR dan DAP terhadap PAS di Selangor sangat dingin, cume nye PAS sahaje yang nampak ber lebih2 untuk membodek dan ambil hati PKR dan DAP tu. Memang Tok dah jangkekan bahawe PAS ni sedar diri nye tu hidup se mate2 bergantung kepade sokongan PKR dan DAP.

Tanpa dari sokongan dari PKR dan DAP siape lah PAS di negeri Selangor ni. PAS terpakse menjadi pencacai kepade PKR dan DAP untuk terus menyambung nyawe nye di Selangor.

ANGIN PERUBAHAN

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 09:25 PM PDT

ANGIN PERUBAHAN


Struktur MRT Di Kota Damansara Runtuh?

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 08:52 AM PDT

Gambar di bawah ini dipercayai konkrit runtuhan MRT, namun sehingga kini belum ada pengesahan rasmi daripada pihak berwajib tentang kejadian yang sebenarnya berlaku. Bersama kita doakan agar semuanya dalam keadaan baik.



Memalukan Rakyat Penang, Sikap Exco Penang Ini

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 06:45 AM PDT

Hujah Kuat Mengapa Wan Azizah Tidak Layak Jadi MB Selangor

Posted: 17 Aug 2014 10:48 PM PDT



Amaran Nik Aziz Pada Anwarinas, Jangan Seronok Sangat

Posted: 17 Aug 2014 09:33 PM PDT

GERAKAN ANTI PKR

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 09:11 PM PDT

BERANI MEMBUAT PILIHAN...

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 03:02 PM PDT

BERANI MEMBUAT PILIHAN...


Menari separa lucah tidak halang undangan untuk baca Al-quran

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 09:30 AM PDT

Dewi Perssik dipilih untuk memperdengarkan bacaan ayat suci al-Quran
Jakarta: Penyanyi dangdut yang juga aktres kontroversi, Dewi Persik dipilih untuk memperdengarkan bacaaan ayat suci al-Quran pada perhimpunan agung Parti Kebangkitan Bangsa (PKB) yang ditetapkan pada 31 Ogos dan 1 September depan.

Perkara itu dimaklumkan pengerusi jawatankuasa pemandu perhimpunan Abdul Kadir Karding.

Menurutnya perhimpunan itu diadakan di Surabaya.

"Jawatankuasa menetapkan Dewi Persik menjadi qariah dalam acara berkenaan," kata Abdul Kadir.

Menurutnya, PKB tidak berdepan masalah untuk meminta Depe, nama popular Dewi Persik, untuk membacakan ayat suci al-Quran pada majlis itu meskipun dia terbabit dengan pelbagai kontroversi.

"Buat kami, membaca ayat suci itu baik.

Meskipun dia (Depe) artis kontroversi, tidak ada masalah untuk meminta dia membaca ayat suci.

Tambahan pula dia juga anak kiai di Jember, Jawa Timur dan lulusan sekolah Islam pula.

"Kami sudah beberapa kali mendengar dia mengaji dan suaranya memang bagus.

"Jadi tidak salah untuk memberi kesempatan kepada Depe menjadi seorang daripada qariah pada acara itu," katanya.

Dia juga berkata, walaupun PKB dikenali sebagai parti yang dianggotai penyokong Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), ia tetap memberikan peluang kepada golongan profesional untuk bergabung dalam parti yang diketuai Muhaimin Iskandar itu.

"Pada perhimpunan kali ini, kami membuka peluang kepada golongan profesional termasuk artis untuk bergabung.

Ini kerana kita tidak mahu PKB dilihat sebagai parti berdasarkan Islam dan anggota NU saja.

Kami mahu membukanya kepada semua golongan," kata Abdul Kadir.

Selain mengaji, Depe juga akan menyanyi pada perhimpunan itu.

PKB juga turut mengundang artis lain seperti raja dangdut Rhoma Irama, Raisa dan Rossa ke perhimpunan itu.

- Agensi

Siswi terkilan diaibkan rakan lelaki di laman sosial

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 02:36 AM PDT

KUANTAN - Seorang mahasiswi bukan sahaja berdepan dengan situasi memalukan dan menyedihkan tetapi terkilan apabila diaibkan seorang rakan lelaki di laman sosial Facebook, tiga hari lalu.

Wan Nur Shaqyra Husna Wan Azlan, 21, menerima kiriman gambar daripada aplikasi 'WhatsApp' daripada rakan baiknya kelmarin yang menunjukkan gambar mereka diapit dengan gambar binatang iaitu anjing dan khinzir.

Menurutnya, sebaik menerima gambar itu, dia terkejut dan sedih selain rasa diaibkan.

"Saya dan rakan tidak tahu apa motif lelaki terbabit menyunting gambar kami dan meletakkan gambar binatang di antara kami.

"Saya hanya mengenali lelaki itu kerana dia berkawan rapat dengan seorang lagi rakan serumah saya ketika belajar di sebuah institusi pengajian awam di Ipoh," katanya ketika ditemui di sini.

Wan Nur Shaqyra yang juga anak bongsu kepada Yang Dipertua Badan Kebajikan Kemanusiaan dan Kemiskinan Seluruh Pahang (Bakkiss) Wan Azlan Wan Salleh itu berkata, dia yang sudah tamat pengajian empat bulan lalu bingung dengan situasi tersebut.

Katanya, gambar mereka turut dimuatkan di laman sosial atas nama 'Jet Pejuang'.

"Selepas melihat gambar itu, saya dan bapa menghubungi lelaki itu supaya meminta maaf dan padam gambar tersebut.

"Dia akur dan meminta maaf namun hanya dibuat secara sambil lewa selain turut membuat kenyataan berbaur ugutan," katanya.

Sehubungan itu, Wan Nur Syaqyra membuat laporan polis di Balai Polis Beserah untuk membersihkan namanya dan berharap pihak berkuasa mengambil tindakan tegas.

Sementara ibu Wan Nur Syaqyra, Nora Muda, 46, turut melahirkan rasa sedih di atas insiden yang menimpa anak bongsunya.

"Perkara itu tidak wajar berlaku dan ia memalukan kita sebagai orang Melayu yang beragama Islam.

"Saya cukup berharap pihak bertanggungjawab mengambil perhatian serius terhadap perkara ini dan si pelaku patut diadili," katanya.

Lelaki gila seks melancap ditepi jalan di Melaka

Posted: 17 Aug 2014 11:01 PM PDT


Satu kejadian yang sangat menjijikan telah berlaku berdekatan Apartment Ixora, Melaka. Seorang pengguna Twitter telah melaporkan dia melihat seorang lelaki telah beronani di tepi jalan, berhadapan apartmentnya. Tanpa sebarang 'cover' lelaki itu bertindak sedemikian mungkin beranggapan ada orang yang suka melihat perbuatannya.



Kejadian berlaku di Apartment Ixora yang berada berdekatan dengan MMU Melaka. Menurut pengguna twitter itu, dia telah menghubungi pihak polis dan lelaki itu telah ditampar tiga kali oleh polis tersebut serta sudah dibawa ke balai.



Komennya lagi di status berkenaan, perkara sedemikian rupa, yang lebih teruk pernah berlaku dikawasan berdekatan, iaitu kisah seorang lelaki  tiba-tiba berbuat aksi yang sama di sebelah kawannya ketika di perhentian bas.



Kepada penduduk yang menetap di kawasan terbabit atau berdekatan dengannya, silalah berhati-hati dengan orang-orang yang sebegini. Jika ada ternampak apa-apa yang mencurigakan, hubungi pihak berkuasa dengan segera

Nora Danish maki 'bodoh' di Legoland Hotel

Posted: 17 Aug 2014 10:31 PM PDT

Huh, tak pasal-pasal Nora Danish kata bodoh kat Lego Hotel, Johor Bahru, apa kes ini?

Rupa-rupanya memang berasas makian pelakon comel ini, masakan tidak, kakaknya, Nadya Danish, rakan baiknya, Zareema Zainal dan pengawal peribadi kekasih Nora, Nedim Nazri dikatakan terperangkap dalam lif selama satu jam, namun tiada sebarang respons daripada pihak bertangggungjawab.
Memang tak patut betul..

Nasib tak jadi apa-apa yang serius kat mereka yang terlibat.

Moga-moga pihak yang berkenaan mengambil berat teguran Nora agar perkara sebegini tidak lagi berulang di kemudian hari. – MYNEWSHUB.MY

PAS berjaya pujuk Nik Aziz tolak MB Khalid

Posted: 17 Aug 2014 10:01 PM PDT

Pertemuan Presiden PAS, Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang dengan Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat di pejabatnya di Kompleks Kota Darul Naim, Kota Bharu, hari ini. - Foto Zaman Huri Isa
KOTA BHARU: Mursyidul Am PAS, Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat menyokong keputusan yang diambil Mesyuarat Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat berhubung krisis Menteri Besar Selangor semalam.

Perkara ini dinyatakan Nik Aziz kepada Presiden PAS, Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang semasa pertemuan mereka di pejabatnya di Kompleks Kota Darul Naim, di sini.

Mesyuarat Jawatankuasa PAS Pusat pagi semalam menarik balik sokongan kepada Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim dan menamakan Presiden PKR, Datin Seri Wan Azizah Wan Ismail dan Timbalannya, Mohamed Azmin Ali sebagai calon Menteri Besar Selangor.

Mesyuarat Majlis Pimpinan Pakatan Rakyat kemudian memutuskan untuk kekal mengemukakan Dr Wan Azizah sebagai calon tunggal bagi menggantikan Abdul Khalid.

Gadis tak tahu maksud onani

Posted: 17 Aug 2014 09:00 PM PDT

Saya wanita berusia 20 tahun dan masih bujang. Saya bertanya untuk menambah pengetahuan kerana saya kurang memahami perkara berikut:

1. Apakah yang dimaksudkan dengan perbuatan onani dan kesannya.

2. Saya kerap mengalami pengeluaran cecair jernih dari faraj dan kadang-kadang keputihan setiap kali sebelum haid. Adakah keadaan ini normal? Adakah itu menandakan wanita itu subur?

3. Adakah air mani hanya akan keluar melalui persetubuhan? Adakah akan terasa seperti terdapat getaran pada bawah perut? Bolehkah ia keluar disebabkan faktor lain contohnya melalui sentuhan ketika mencuci selepas membuang air kecil?


4. Saya kerap menukar seluar dan menggunakan pantyliner kerana sering keluar cecair lendir, licin dengan warna kadang-kadang jernih dan putih. Saya sangat tidak selesa jadi saya membersihkan bahagian terbabit dengan sabun hingga hilang rasa lendir. Kemudian saya gunakan tisu untuk mengeringkan bahagian itu. Adakah cara ini betul? Saya keliru dan ragu-ragu jika cecair yang keluar itu air mani. Harap doktor dapat memberi penjelasan.

RIN

Menambah ilmu pengetahuan memang digalakkan, tetapi lebih elok jika kita memastikan ilmu yang lebih perlu ada pada kita semasa itu dipenuhi dahulu sebelum mengambil tahu mengenai ilmu yang kita tidak sepatutnya amalkan.

Persoalan yang diajukan dengan tujuan menambah ilmu, tetapi tiada kaitan dengan amalan hidup kita lazimnya bersifat secara umum sahaja dan tidaklah mengharapkan jawapan yang mendalam. Peringatan ini diberi ke atas persoalan sensitif bagi masyarakat kita, lebih-lebih lagi apabila ia ditegah oleh agama.

Onani adalah perbuatan memuaskan diri secara seksual. Ia dilakukan dengan berbagai cara, sama ada menggunakan anggota sendiri ataupun alatan lain. Orang yang melakukan onani mengharapkan kesan kepuasan seksual. Dari sudut perubatan, ia boleh mendatangkan kesan kepada kepekaan saraf pada bahagian berkenaan selain kesan ketagihan sehingga memerlukan bantuan pakar psikiatri.

Air mani pula lebih merujuk kepada cecair mani yang dikeluarkan oleh lelaki sewaktu ejakulasi apabila mengalami kemuncak seksual. Tidak semestinya ia keluar sewaktu persetubuhan sahaja. Anda mungkin merujuk kepada orgasma yang turut dialami oleh wanita. Ia boleh berlaku sama ada secara hubungan seks penetratif, aktiviti seks bukan penetratif (termasuk onani), sentuhan, malah secara imaginasi seksual.

Pengeluaran cecair dari faraj boleh disebabkan keadaan semulajadi/fisiologi dalam kitaran haid. Ia juga boleh disebabkan jangkitan kuman, sama ada kuman dari permukaan kulit kemaluan, jari atau apa yang menyentuh kawasan berhampiran kemaluan, hubungan seksual sama ada seksual penetratif dan oral dan lain-lain.

Membersihkan kemaluan memadai menggunakan air paip sahaja. Sekiranya dikhuatiri ada jangkitan, membersihkan menggunakan air bercampur sedikit garam masakan dapat membantu. Walau bagaimanapun, perbuatan mencuci itu sendiri boleh menjurus kepada jangkitan kuman terutama apabila sentiasa menggunakan tangan/jari kerana anggota badan kita bukan bebas kuman sepenuhnya.



Pakar Sakit Puan

 

Menantu perkosa ibu mertua berkemban

Posted: 17 Aug 2014 08:01 PM PDT

Gambar hiasan
Sibu: Sifat kebinatangan menguasai nafsu seorang menantu apabila sanggup memperkosa ibu mentua yang juga warga emas dengan menutup mulutnya menggunakan kain dalam kejadian di sebuah rumah di Kampung Jeriah, Jumaat lalu.

Dalam kejadian jam 4 petang, mangsa berusia 69 tahun bukan saja diperkosa, malah dibiarkan menanggung kesakitan sebaik perbuatan terkutuk itu dilakukan di rumahnya.

Sumber berkata, sebelum kejadian mangsa berseorangan di rumah sambil berkemban sebelum suspek berusia 42 tahun secara tiba-tiba muncul di hadapan pintu.

"Suspek terus memasuki rumah dan menutup pintu serta cuba merogol ibu mentuanya. Sebelum itu, suspek menolak mangsa ke lantai lalu menyelak kain batik dipakainya.

"Wanita terbabit cuba melawan sambil menjerit sekuat hati, namun kudrat yang ada tidak mampu menghalang menantu yang kemudian merogolnya.

"Suspek turut menyumbat mulut mangsa dengan kain bagi mengelak jeritannya didengari jiran," katanya ketika ditemui, semalam.

Ghairah muat naik gambar seksi

Posted: 17 Aug 2014 07:01 PM PDT

Kuala Lumpur: Buli siber memberi impak yang begitu mendalam kepada mangsa terutama selepas menerima ancaman dan diaibkan sejurus gambar mangsa tersebar di Internet, kata Pakar Perunding Kanan Psikiatri Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Prof Dr Osman Che Bakar.

Menurutnya, bagaimanapun, perkara itu boleh dicegah sekiranya mangsa tidak memuat naik gambar seksi atau mengghairahkan di laman sosial terutama Facebook (FB).

"Saya lihat sesetengah wanita kini begitu ghairah memuat naik gambar mereka berpakaian seksi semata-mata untuk keseronokan dan minta dipuji.

"Perbuatan ini dilihat secara sengaja mendedahkan diri mereka kepada bahaya, lebih-lebih lagi apabila gambar itu jatuh ke tangan individu yang tidak bermoral," katanya kepada Harian Metro, di sini, semalam.

Katanya, masyarakat perlu maklum di dalam dunia ini ada segelintir lelaki yang mempunyai penyakit seksual melampau.

'Bantah' keputusan Majlis Syura, Nik Aziz mahu jumpa Hadi

Posted: 17 Aug 2014 06:30 PM PDT

Mursyidul Am PAS Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat akan mengadakan pertemuan dengan presiden parti itu, Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang untuk mendapatkan penjelasan berhubung keputusan parti hari ini mengenai krisis politik di Selangor.

Bekas menteri besar Kelantan itu berkata beliau akan membuat kenyataan setelah pertemuan berkenaan yang dijangka berlangsung di pejabatnya di Institut Pemikiran Tok Guru di Kota Darulnaim, hari ini.

"Saya tidak boleh sebut (komen) selagi presiden (PAS) tidak beri penjelasan kepada saya," katanya kepada pemberita ketika ditemui di rumahnya di Kampung Pulau Melaka, hari ini.

PAS hari ini membuat pendirian yang mengelirukan apabila mengumumkan tidak lagi menyokong kepimpinan Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim sebagai Menteri Besar Selangor.

Selain itu, mesyuarat khas Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat di Kuala Lumpur itu turut mencalonkan dua nama iaitu Presiden PKR Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail dan timbalannya, Mohamad Azmin Ali sebagai calon menteri besar yang baharu bagi menggantikan Khalid.

Tindakan itu bertentangan dengan keputusan Majlis Syura Ulama sebelum ini yang memberi sokongan penuh kepada Khalid untuk kekal sebagai menteri besar. – Bernama, 17 Ogos, 2014.

Pakatan lebih kuat selepas krisis MB Selangor

Posted: 17 Aug 2014 06:15 PM PDT

Para pemimpin PAS di sidang media selepas mesyuarat Jawatankuasa Agung tentang isu menteri besar Selangor yang berakhir hari ini. – Gambar The Malaysian Insider oleh Afif Abd Halim, 17 Ogos, 2014.
Adakah terdapat keraguan PAS akan mengambil ketetapan menyokong cadangan agar Presiden PKR Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail mengambil alih kedudukan sebagai menteri besar Selangor daripada Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim?

Jawapan ringkasnya adalah "ya". Dan sepanjang 24 hari lalu sejak PKR secara rasmi mencadangkan nama beliau, gabungan tiga parti – DAP, PAS dan PKR – terikat kepada idea PAS mungkin mempunyai pendapat lain tentang isu menteri besar Selangor itu.

Namun, kepimpinan PAS membuat ketetapan hari ini, memutuskan Dr Wan Azizah dan timbalan beliau, Mohamed Azmin Ali, boleh menggantikan Khalid – menteri besar penggal kedua yang dipecat minggu lalu kerana melanggar perintah parti agar meletakkan jawatan.

Para pemimpin dan wakil parti komponen bersetuju keputusan PAS mengukuhkan Pakatan Rakyat yang muncul selepas Pilihan Raya Umum 2008 (PRU12) dan memenangi lebih banyak kerusi dalam PRU13.

Mereka juga menyedari kemelut di Selangor yang memudarkan pemerintahan mereka di negeri terkaya di negara ini, secara ironinya bertentangan dengan matlamat Langkah Kajang untuk meningkat dan mengukuhkan kerajaan Pakatan di negeri ini.

Episod ini juga menunjukkan wujudnya hubungan antara parti yang sangat erat dan mesra di peringkat ahli pada dua PRU terakhir dan Pilihan Raya Kecil (PRK) yang tidak terkira banyaknya, tetapi di kalangan pimpinan, hubungan ini hanya sekadar rakan sekerja yang saling meragui niat politik masing-masing.

"Mungkin kita boleh elakkannya jika para pemimpin PKR menerangkan kepada sekutu mereka Langkah Kajang sebelum mencadangkan nama Dr Wan Azizah. Tetapi ia tidak dilakukan.

"Kita perlu memberi tumpuan kepada kepimpinan sekarang, bagi mengelakkan masalah sama berulang pada masa akan datang," kata seorang wakil parti kepada The Malaysian Insider.

Menjadi rahsia terbuka yang Presiden PAS Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang tidak rapat dengan Ketua Umum PKR Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim – fakta yang didedahkan pada satu mesyuarat singkat minggu lepas yang diadakan untuk menyelesaikan isu MB Selangor.

Sumber Pakatan juga berkata, pemimpin DAP Lim Guan Eng dan Lim Kit Siang yang terpaksa menyediakan ruang terbuka bagi pimpinan tertinggi parti masing-masing dalam tempoh tiga minggu lalu.

"Hakikatnya, DAP satu-satunya parti yang memberi sokongan padu kepada Dr Wan Azizah. Parti lain mempunyai isu tertentu tetapi ia mengambil kesabaran dan masa memperbaiki keadaan dan bergerak ke hadapan," kata seorang sumber.

Keputusan PAS hari ini, mereka berkata, adalah hasil kerja keras dalam PAS dan juga dalam Pakatan untuk memastikan kejayaan selanjutnya bagi gabungan parti pembangkang itu.

"Keputusan PAS menunjukkan kita perlu bertindak bersama-sama, bukannya seorang diri," Setiausaha Agung DAP Guan Eng memberitahu The Malaysian Insider petang ini.

"Kami menjadi lebih kuat dengan kejadian ini," kata Guan Eng yang juga ketua menteri Pulau Pinang. Pakatan menguasai tiga negeri – Kelantan, Pulau Pinang dan Selangor, serta kini memegang 87 kerusi persekutuan.

Bagaimanapun, beliau mengakui Pakatan perlu bekerja lebih keras untuk mengatasi kejatuhan politik dan pentadbiran sejak tiga minggu lepas apabila hanya DAP dan PKR segera menyokong Dr Wan Azizah tetapi pemimpin PAS tidak pasti dan meminta lebih masa.

"Kita mempunyai tiga tahun untuk menebus semula apa yang berlaku. Saya pasti ia boleh dilakukan," kata Guan Eng.

Ahli Jawatankuasa Kerja Pusat PAS Dr Dzukefly Ahmad bersetuju Pakatan kini lebih kuat selepas isu MB Selangor.

"Keputusan itu menguatkan PR dan kami kini boleh menggantikan Khalid, " kata Dr Dzukefly, ahli strategi utama dalam PAS bagi dua PRU lalu yang bekerja rapat dengan sekutu PR lain untuk memastikan pakatan kukuh.

Pengarah Komunikasi PKR Fahmi Fadzil memuji keputusan PAS hari ini sebagai "satu peristiwa penting dalam proses kematangan gabungan politik ".

"Penyelesaian konflik seperti yang kita lihat dalam lanjutan episod ini adalah satu prasyarat bagi hubungan kerja yang berfungsi dan pragmatik antara parti komponen Pakatan.

"Saya rasa PAS mengambil pendekatan yang pragmatik. Ini menunjukkan kepada kita PAS jauh daripada menjadi entiti politik mono-budaya, sebaliknya mempunyai pelbagai pandangan dan suara," katanya.

Namun, beliau bersetuju pihak pakatan "perlu bekerja keras untuk membaiki imej buruk yang terjadi disebabkan kemelut ini ".

"Saya rasa jurang perbezaan ini boleh diatasi," kata Fahmi, menambah suntikan dan kemasukan pemimpin muda ke dalam parti akan memastikan perubahan kepada keadaan lebih baik sebelum PRU akan datang.

Seorang pemimpin pakatan meletakkannya ringkas dengan berkata "Ini adalah langkah pertama bagi satu perjalanan yang panjang untuk kita di Selangor. Kita mempunyai banyak kerja untuk dilakukan." – 17 Ogos, 2014.
- See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/bahasa/article/pakatan-lebih-kuat-selepas-krisis-mb-selangor-kini-beri-tumpuan-kepada-kepi#sthash.W8lTNsBf.dpuf

Aziz Bari: Keputusan Pas semalam tiada makna

Posted: 17 Aug 2014 06:00 PM PDT

KUALA LUMPUR - "Sebaik-baik sahaja Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail dapat kemukakan 30 orang di belakang beliau 'game over' untuk Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim dan Pas," demikian menurut bekas pensyarah Undang-Undang Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia mengenai keputusan Pas hari ini.

Aziz berkata, keputusan yang dibuat oleh Pas semalam sememangnya tidak membawa sebarang makna.

"Dalam undang-undang, Menteri Besar, Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim sudah jatuh.

"Situasinya adalah seperti seorang pencuri yang ingin memulangkan barang yang beliau curi kepada tuannya.

"Baiklah dalam bahasa mudahnya mana lebih banyak di antara 30 dengan 26," katanya pada forum mengenai keadaan politik Selangor di Dewan Himpunan Cina hari ini.

Justeru, Aziz dengan sinisnya berkata, Pas sekiranya ingin bersama dalam arus politk negara perlu pandai mengurus pasukannya.

"Kalau nak main bola hendaklah main bola bukannya bermain ragbi.

"Nak main bola main bola, kalau tidak pandai belajar," katanya.

Bagaimanapun, hujahan Aziz itu disangkal Ahli Parlimen Shah Alam, Khalid Samad yang mengatakan keputusan Pas semalam tidak membawa sebarang makna.

"Untuk politik, ini bukan keputusan yang tiada makna, tetapi satu keputusan yang membawa sejarah kepada politik negara dan Pakatan Rakyat," katanya.

waadat

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 01:47 PM PDT

waadat


Akhirnya u turn juga

Posted: 17 Aug 2014 06:53 PM PDT

PAS hari ini...

apa diharap padi seberang
entah berbuah entahkan tidak
entah dimakan burung melayang
apa diharap PAS sekarang
entah PAS betul entahkan tidak
entah-entahkan dah jadi sarang musang

Apa Yang Tersirat

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 01:38 PM PDT

Apa Yang Tersirat


Tun Dr Mahathir Tidak Menyokong Kerajaan Najib Lagi

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 04:50 AM PDT

MENEGUR

1. Ada orang yang memberitahu kepada Dato Seri Najib Tun Razak yang saya telah memburukkan pemerintahannya.

2. Saya tidak akan menyangkal kerana saya telah berkali-kali menegur dasar-dasar Kerajaan sekarang.

3. Saya menegur kerana saya berpendapat pemimpin yang tidak ditegur akan percaya segala-gala yang dilakukan oleh mereka baik-baik belaka. Hanya apabila ditegur sahaja barulah pemimpin akan sedar akan kesalahan dan mungkin akan memperbetulkannya.

4. Izinkan saya mencerita cerita dongeng berkenaan seorang raja Inggeris. Ia dikelilingi dengan ramai dato-dato yang mendakwa dia adalah seorang raja yang amat berkuasa keatas segala-galanya. Demikian pasang-surut air di laut pun akan patuh kepada perintahnya.

5 Alkesah, maka pada satu hari raja menitah untuk meletakkan takhtanya di pantai menghadapi laut.

6. Air sedang pasang dan raja bertanya kepada dato-datonya apakah baginda boleh hentikan air pasang supaya tidak basahkan kakinya.

7. Jawab mereka, "Ya, Tuanku. Air tidak akan sampai kaki Tuanku."

8. Maka raja pun menitah supaya air laut itu tidak naik lagi.

9. Tetapi air laut itu terus pasang dan kena pada kaki baginda. Maka baginda pun murka kepada dato-datonya.
Demikianlah sikap dato-dato kerana ingin menyenangkan hati raja mereka.

10. Satu lagi cerita dongeng juga ialah berkenaan dato-dato istana yang tidak pernah menegur raja. Mereka sepanjang masa mengiyakan saja apa juga yang dilakukan oleh raja.
11. Satu hari raja masuk dewan dalam keadaan bogel. Baginda bertanya cantikkah pakaiannya. Semua angguk kepala dan berkata "Ya Tuanku".

12. Hanya seorang budak yang berkata, "Tuanku bogel."

13. Maka raja pun murka akan dato-datonya yang tidak berkata yang benar apabila dia bogel.

14. Kita boleh dapat sedikit pelajaran dari cerita-cerita dongeng ini.

15. Orang Melayu mempunyai banyak pepatah yang boleh jadi panduan dalam kehidupan mereka. Antaranya ingin saya sebut disini:
"Sayangkan anak tangan-tangankan
Sayangkan isteri tinggal-tinggalkan"
Dengan izin saya ingin menambah sedikit kepada pepatah ini.
"Sayangkan pemimpin tegur-tegurkan"

16. Saya lihat bagaimana orang Melayu tidak mudah menegur pemimpin. Walaupun pemimpin jelas bersalah, tidak ada siapa yang sanggup menegur secara terbuka. Tetapi di belakang pemimpin mereka akan keluarkan kata-kata yang kesat terhadapnya.

17. Mungkin saya berbeza sedikit dari Melayu lain. Apabila YTM Tunku membuat beberapa dasar dan tindakan yang tidak disenangi oleh ramai orang Melayu, saya menulis surat menegur Tunku.

18. Walaupun kerananya saya dipecat, tetapi YTM Tunku meletak jawatan sebagai Perdana Menteri. Mungkin bukan kerana teguran saya, tetapi hakikatnya Tunku mengundur diri.

19. Demikian juga dengan Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi. Mungkin kerana teguran, mungkin kerana prestasi buruk Pilihanraya ke 12. Tetapi hakikatnya Tun Abdullah juga letak jawatan.

20. Saya sendiri pun letak jawatan. Sebahagian dari sebabnya ialah kerana saya dengar bisik-bisik yang menyoal "Bila lagi orang tua ini akan pergi." Saya percaya jika saya tidak letak jawatan, bisik akan jadi jeritan.

21. Pilihan saya bagi mengganti Tun Abdullah ialah Dato Seri Najib. Setelah beberapa lama dilihat bahawa dasar dan tindakan Dato Seri Najib tidak lebih berkesan dari Tun Abdullah.

22. Saya tidak sangka yang pencapaiannya dalam Pilihanraya Umum ke13 lebih buruk dari Tun Abdullah.

23. Harapan saya Dato Seri Najib akan mengambil ikhtibar dari prestasinya yang buruk dalam Pilihanraya Umum ke 13. Malangnya sehingga kini tidak ternampak apa-apa perubahan dari segi dasar atau pendekatan walaupun saya cuba menyampaikan pendapat saya, (yang juga pendapat ramai yang datang bertemu saya) secara langsung kepada Dato Seri Najib.

24. Saya tidak ada pilihan selain dari menarik balik sokongan saya. Ini pun tidak berkesan. Oleh itu terpaksalah saya menegur.

25. Apakah dianya yang saya fikir salah. Ia bermula dengan pendirian melayani semua tuntutan musuh. ISA dan undang-undang buang daerah dimansuh. Tindakan ini tidak sedikit pun mengurangkan tentangan oleh parti lawan. Sebaliknya jenayah bertambah dengan banyaknya kerana pembebasan ketua-ketua geng.

26. Demikian juga dengan sikap merendah diri kepada negara jiran sehingga urusan dalam negeri pun tertakluk kepada pendapat Kerajaan negara jiran.

27. Tetapi pendapat kaum dan parti yang kuat menyokong untuk menyelamatkan kedudukan Kerajaan tidak diberi layanan yang saksama.

28. Wang Kerajaan diguna untuk mempengaruhi sokongan rakyat apabila sahaja pilihanraya umum diadakan. Ini menjadikan rakyat terlalu bergantung kepada Kerajaan untuk segala-galanya. Bagi yang betul-betul miskin, bantuan seperti ini memanglah wajar. Tetapi beribu rakyat yang ditawar menolak bantuan wang seperti ini. Semangat rakyat untuk bekerja menjadi luntur apabila mereka diberi ganjaran tanpa apa-apa usaha oleh mereka. Semangat ini tidak akan menolong pembangunan Negara.

29. Dasar ekonomi mengutamakan tuntutan pengguna. Impot barangan digalakan dan industri tempatan diabaikan, bahkan dihalang oleh dasar Kerajaan.
30. Cuti ditambah sehingga adakalanya pekerja bercuti lebih satu minggu. Sebaliknya gaji minimum dinaikkan tanpa mengambilkira kenaikan kos yang boleh menjadi perniagaan dan perusahaan tidak bedayasaing dengan barangan impot.

31. Sesungguhnya banyaklah dasar, pendekatan dan perbuatan Kerajaan pimpinan Dato Seri Najib yang merosakkan hubungan antara kaum, merosakkan ekonomi dan kewangan negara.

32. Semua ini disebabkan penyokong Kerajaan tidak pernah menegur pemimpin.

33. Jikalau tiada siapa yang sanggup menegur, biarlah saya menegur. Saya pernah dipecat oleh Tunku Abdul Rahman, dipulau oleh Datuk Seri Abdullah dan difitnah oleh ramai. Jika kerana menegur saya akan didera, terpaksalah saya terima.

34. Bukanlah saya tidak sayang pemimpin. Tetapi saya lebih sayang bangsa dan negara saya. Chedet.cc

Kemelut MB Selangor: PKR Perlekeh Pas

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 04:32 AM PDT

PKR Perundagan PKR Aziz Bari, memperlekeh keputusan JKP Pas yang melakukan pusingan U berkaitan dengan kedudukan Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim.

Menurut Aziz, apabila Wan Azizah mendapat 30 sokongan ADUN PKR-DAP dan Dua Adun Pas, maka "Game Over" bagi Khalid Ibrahim.

Keputusan JKP Pas pada 17 Ogos, tidak lagi bermakna, atas sebab Wan Azizah mempunyai sokongan yang diperlukan untuk dilantik sebagai Menteri Besar.

Ekoran keputusan JKP Pas itu, bukan sahaja Presiden Pas, Muryidul Am Pas, Majlis Syura, Ulamak terpaksa menelan kahak sendiri, akan tetapi mendapat oenghinaan daripada PKR.

Dalam masa seminggu, pemimpin PKR dan DAP menghentam kepimpinan Pas; namun parti itu masih berpihak kepada dua parti itu. Nampak sangat Pas, terpaksa melutut dan angguk kepada PKR dan DAP.

Pas kini, macam sebuah parti yang tidak bermaruah lagi; atas sebab itu; apa sahaja keputusannnya bakal atau tidak akan dihormati atau diambilkira oleh PKR dan DAP.

Jika berlaku pilihanraya, adalah pasti bukan sahaja pemimpin PKR dan DAP akan tetapi penyokong dua parti itu akan memastikan bahawa calon-calon PAS yang tidak sebulu dengan mereka dipastikan kalah, sebaliknya yang sebulu itu sahaja yang disokong. Sebaliknya Pas pula, baik pemimpin mahupun penyokongnya akan bermatian-matian menyokong calon-calon dua parti itu.

Kemelut MB Selangor: Mat Sabu Jadi Ayam Daging Anwar dan Guan Eng- Zuhdi Marzuki

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 12:40 AM PDT

Pengarah Operasi Pusat Penyelidikan PAS Dr Zuhdi Marzuki mengkritik keputusan Timbalan Presiden PAS Mohamad Sabu kerana bersetuju dengan keputusan Pakatan Rakyat (PR) untuk mencalonkan Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail sebagai calon tunggal Menteri Besar Selangor.

Beliau memanggil Timbalan Presiden PAS itu dengan gelaran "ayam sabung PAS' yang hilang tajinya.

"Ayam sabung PAS sudah menjadi ayam daging (Datuk Seri) Anwar Ibrahim dan Lim Guan Eng," tulisnya dalam akaun Facebook miliknya hari ini.

Bahkan beliau juga dilihat membidas kegagalan bagi mempertahankan keputusan sebulat suara yang telah diputuskan oleh PAS sebelum ini.

"PAS Pusat telah sebulat suara mencalonkan dua pemimpin PKR. Keputusan sebulat suara inipun tak boleh dipertahankan bila berdepan dengan PKR dan DAP.

"Paling tidak beritahu pada PKR dan DAP, kami perlu bawa balik kepada PAS Pusat keputusan PR hari ini yang hanya mencalonkan Datuk Seri Wan Azizah. Tak akan perkara itupun tak boleh buat?," tulisnya lagi.

Semalam, Ketua Umum PKR, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim menegaskan untuk tetap dengan keputusan mencalonkan Presiden PKR, Datuk Seri Dr. Wan Azizah Wan Ismail sebagai Menteri Besar Selangor.

Menurutnya, PR akan meneruskan proses untuk menyembahkan keputusan ini kepada Sultan Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah.

"Keputusan ini telah ditandatangani oleh Setiausaha Agung DAP, Lim Guan Eng, Timbalan Presiden PAS, Mohamad Sabu dan saya sendiri," katanya pada sidang media di Empire Hotel, Subang semalam.

Kemelut MB Selangor: Pas Sebuah Parti Flip Flop

Posted: 17 Aug 2014 11:49 PM PDT

SELEPAS keputusan Flip Flop Pas, kini parti itu meletakan sepenuhnya keputusan penggantian Menteri Besar Selangor kepada Sultan Selangor. Bukan sahaja Hadi Awang malah Nik Azizpun bernada sama.

Mengapa Sultan dibabitkan? kemelut pergantian MB Selangor bukan berpeunca daripada Sultan; Kemelut MB Selangor atas sebab Anwar mahu isterinya jadi MB.

Pas kini, telah menelan ludahnya sendiri, kerana sudah akur dengan nepotisme; menelan ludahnya sendiri kerana menyokong Wan Azizah.

Nampaknya Pas adalah sebuah parti yang tiada pendirian, ianya sebuah parti angguk kepada Anwar dan Lim Guan Eng. 

AYT tidak mahu lagi mendengar diperingkat manapun pimpinan Pas bercakap soal-soal nepotisme, soal-soal itegriti, soal-soal demokrasi atau keadilan; kerana parti itu tiada hak bercakap mengenainya; kerana kini sudah terdedah, bahawa Pas ada sebuah parti Flip Flop.

Cucu Tok Selampit

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 01:07 PM PDT

Cucu Tok Selampit


Kenyataan Akhbar Sultan Selangor Untuk PR - Tunggu Beta Balik Kalau Meroyan Sangat Nak Ganti Menteri Besar

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 01:22 AM PDT


Buat puak-puak PR yang tergila-gila sangat hendak menaikkan isteri Ketua Umum (KETUM), Dr Wan Azizah sebagai Menteri Besar Selangor dan Anwar Ibrahim sebagai Pengerusi Balkis, diharap mereka dapat bersabar sehingga 27 Ogos ini. Setiausaha Sulit Sultan Selangor, Dato Mohamad Munir Bani telah mengesahkan bahawa Menteri Besar Selangor, TS Abdul Khalid Khalid Ibrahim telah memohon untuk mengadap Baginda Sultan di Budapest, Hungary. 

Walaubagaimanapun, Baginda telah menolak dan meminta Menteri Besar Selangor menunggu sehingga Baginda balik ke tanahair pada 27 Ogos ini. Buat sementara waktu, TS Khalid Ibrahim adalah Menteri Besar Selangor yang sah dan juak-juak PR diharap menghentikan drama sinetron murahan mereka sehingga ke tarikh berkenaan sebab kami semua sudah muak!!! Ini pula kenyataan TS Khalid Ibrahim selepas menerima maklumbalas daripada Baginda Sultan Selnagor:

Ceramah Burukkan MB Selangor Di Paya Jaras Semalam Juga Gagal!

Posted: 17 Aug 2014 06:54 PM PDT




Dengan barisan penceramah hebat seperti Rafizi Ramli, Saifuddin Nasution, R Sivarasa dan Elizabeth Wong masih gagal untuk mengundang orang ramai untuk hadir mendengar kutukan dan fitnah terhadap Menteri Besar Selangor, TS Abdul Khalid Ibrahim. CTS mencadangkan agar ceramah-ceramah selepas yang akan diadakan selepas ini perlu diadakan hadiah cabutan bertuah seperti kereta, motorsikal, laptop dan sebagainya untuk menarik orang ramai untuk hadir.

SPAD & Persatuan Kebajikan Pemandu Teksi Lancar Program Mengibar Jalur Gemilang Ke 57

Posted: 16 Aug 2014 07:32 PM PDT


Suruhanjaya Pengangkutan Awam Darat (SPAD) dengan kerjasama Persatuan Kebajikan Pemandu Teksi Kuala Lumpur Dan Selangor semalam telah melancarkan 'Program Mengibar Jalur Gemilang' semperna menyambut Hari Kemerdekaan Ke 57. Majlis Perasmian Mengibarkan Jalur Gemilang Tahun ke-57 oleh Pengerusi SPAD, Tan Sri Dato Seri Dr. Syed Hamid Albar di Long Term Car Park, KLIA. 

Jalur Gemilang adalah panji kebanggaan kita semua. Ia adalah simbol solidariti dan perpaduan rakyat Malaysia. Meskipun negara telah dilanda musibah dengan tragedi malang yang menimpa penerbangan MH370 dan MH17, kita harus kekal bersatu untuk melangkah ke arah masa depan yang lebih cemerlang untuk tanahair kita. 

Marilah kita sama-sama menyertai Perdana Menteri DS Najib Razak dan jutaan rakyat yang mengibarkan Jalur Gemilang bermula hari ini demi meraikan sambutan ulangtahun kemerdekaan negara yang ke-57. Langkah SPAD harus dipuji memandangkan pemandu-pemandu teksi di negara ini adlah duta kecil negara di dalam mempromosikan pengibaran Jalur Gemilang semperna Hari Kemerdekaan yang ke 57.








PEJUANG BANGSA

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 11:21 AM PDT

PEJUANG BANGSA


AYAM SABUNG PAS BERTUKAR JADI AYAM DAGING GUAN ENG & ANWAR ??

Posted: 17 Aug 2014 09:35 PM PDT








Tentunya ramai faham maksud AJK Pas Pusat Dr Zuhdi mengenai siapa Ayam Sabung PAS kini sudah menjadi ayam daging Anwar & Guan Eng .

Beliau juga menghentam kegagalan   Ayam Sabung berkenaan gagal mempertahankan keputusan sebulat suara PAS mahu 2 nama dihantar  bila berdepan PKR & DAP .

Nampak jelas PAS walaupun menjadi penentu  siapa MB  di Selangor tetapi begitu  mudah dijadikan kaldai & dipermainkan  oleh PKR dan DAP .





\



PAS DAH JADI PERKASAM , KETUM TUNJUK KUASA HANTAR WAN AZIZAH CALON MB

Posted: 17 Aug 2014 06:36 PM PDT



TAK SAMPAI 24 JAM LEPAS MESYUARAT AJK PAS PUSAT , TERUS  ANWAR  BUAT LAGI MESYUARAT YANG ME PAS   DENGAN MENAMAKAN 1 NAMA SAHAJA IAITU WAN AZIZAH SEBAGAI CALON MB SELANGOR KEPADA SULTAN SELANGOR .

WALHAL PAS MAHU 2 NAMA IAITU WAN AZIZAH DAN AZMIN DIHANTAR ...

TERNYATA KINI PAS TELAH DIKENCINGKAN LAGI SUAMI JIJAH YANG LICIK  MENUNJUKKAN KUASA & MENGESAHKAN PAS HANYA KALDAI SAHAJA YANG MENURUT PERINTAH WALAUPUN TERPAKSA U TURN   .




- Mesyuarat majlis pimpinan pakatan pembangkang sebulat suara menamakan Presiden Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR), Datin Seri Wan Azizah Wan Ismail sebagai calon tunggal Menteri Besar Selangor yang baharu.

Keputusan tersebut sekali gus menolak cadangan Jawatankuasa Kerja Pas Pusat pagi ini yang turut mencadangkan Timbalan Presiden PKR, Azmin Ali sebagai calon untuk jawatan itu selain Wan Azizah.

Penasihat PKR, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim berkata, keputusan itu telah ditandatangani oleh beliau sebagai wakil PKR bersama Setiausaha Agung DAP yang belum disahkan, Lim Guan Eng yang mewakili partinya manakala Pas diwakili Timbalan Presidennya, Mohamad Sabu.

Menurut beliau, surat cadangan pencalonan Wan Azizah akan dipersembahkan kepada Sultan Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah esok bagi memohon perkenan baginda.
"Kita menghargai keputusan Pas untuk kekal dalam pakatan pembangkang serta keperluan pakatan menggantikan jawatan Menteri Besar Selangor. Malah, kita juga mengambil maklum dan menghargai pencalonan Wan Azizah dan Azmin untuk jawatan Menteri Besar.

"Bagaimanapun, Azmin tegas dengan keputusan beliau untuk kekal menyokong keputusan parti bagi menamakan Wan Azizah sebagai calon Menteri Besar Selangor," katanya dalam sidang akhbar selepas mesyuarat itu, di sini hari ini.

Yang turut hadir Naib Presiden Pas, Salahuddin Ayub; Setiausaha Agung Pas, Datuk Mustafa Ali dan Penasihat DAP, Lim Kit Siang.

Sementara itu, Mohamad memaklumkan sokongan Pas terhadap keputusan itu dan turut menyokong usaha pakatan pembangkang mempersembahkan perkara itu kepada Sultan Selangor.

1MalAySia BlogPoLitik

Posted: 18 Aug 2014 09:51 AM PDT

1MalAySia BlogPoLitik


Adakah rakyat Selangor setuju Wan Azizah jadi MB mereka

Posted: 17 Aug 2014 09:00 PM PDT

Dengan perkembangan terbaru ini, Khalid akan memohon menghadap Sultan Selangor untuk memberi nasihat tentang langkah-langkah seterusnya.
"Sehingga Sultan membuat keputusan muktamad, saya akan meneruskan pentadbiran kerajaan negeri Selangor bersama 4 ahli Exco daripada PAS bagi memastikan rakyat tidak terkesan dengan krisis politik ini," Khalid Ibrahim
Pada mesyuaratnya pagi ini, PAS memutuskan bersetuju dengan pilihan PKR melantik Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail menggantikan Khalid. Parti Islam itu juga turut menyerahkan nama Timbalan Presiden PKR Mohamed Azmin Ali sebagai nama calon lain untuk diangkat menjadi menteri besar.

Soalnya Adakah rakyat Selangor setuju Wan Azizah jadi MB mereka?

Pengikut