Sabtu, 8 Oktober 2011

BLOG - BLOG PARTI DAP

BLOG - BLOG PARTI DAP


Piow With You 文标与你

Posted: 08 Oct 2011 01:14 AM PDT

Piow With You 文标与你


我国连续15年财政赤字,和其它失衡数据是令人感到担忧

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 09:19 AM PDT


图:黄文标(右)与行动党德彬丁宜区火箭队成员与市民对财政预算案进行交流。

全国社青团副宣传秘书黄文标对2012年国家财政预算案,已是我国连续15年财政赤字,同时创下建国以来的最高记录,比起去年总开销2120亿令吉,增加了9.4%。其中78%是国家行政开销,仅有22%是发展开销。这些失衡数据是令人感到担忧。

也是行动党德彬丁宜区州议员的他今日在选区进行活动后,表示马来西亚有着令人吃惊的一百二十万公务员大军,它的公务员对人口比率是东亚最高的一国,高出邻近国家至少二倍以上。导致我国现在至未来必须承担高额的行政开销。官僚的封建文化加上效率低的工作态度,使人民必须附上更高的行政开销。

而对于教育体系国阵中央政府还是没有对创新和改革进行投资发展开销,只是废除杂费和购书卷显示政府肤浅的眼光。而且华淡小维修校舍拨款只占国小的20%,民政党主席许子根还能表示公平,马华总会长蔡细历表示预算案非常合时宜的举措。实在令人感到莫名其妙。

针对国际燃油每桶徘徊在80美元,首相还是没有如以往承诺的让燃油每月调整也让人感到失望,导致交通使用者必须高价买低价油。加上政府无意提升国内宽频使用者渗透率,来减低国内与外国相比的高价格,这也与国阵自己扬言要发展网络的努力显得格格不入。


Lim Kit Siang

Posted: 08 Oct 2011 12:16 AM PDT

Lim Kit Siang


Barisan Nasional’s Budget 2012 is like a sugar-coated placebo – makes you feel good after taking it, only to tax you more later

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 07:56 PM PDT

by Tony Pua 8 Oct 2011 It is difficult not to "feel good" after a record-breaking pre-election budget where goodies big and small, were liberally handed out to practically all segments of society. The question is, beneath the sweeteners, are there substantive reforms proposed in the Budget 2012 to make "transformative" changes to our economy [...]

Budget 2012 fails to live up to the Prime Minister’s reform pledges in NEM, GTP and ETP

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 03:35 AM PDT

Media Statement by Tony Pua, DAP National Publicity Secretary and Member of Parliament for Petaling Jaya Utara in Kuala Lumpur The expectations were high for a pre-election budget where Datuk Seri Najib Abdul Razak will stamp his "reformist" credentials. It is for the Prime Minister to put into action the various reform pledges made in [...]

Charles Santiago

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 11:53 PM PDT

Charles Santiago


Majlis Jamuan makan malam

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 07:30 PM PDT

Source: Nan Yang San Pau


Member of Parliament Klang, Charles Santiago said ” I want PKA to reveal their master plan and inform the public why a third port is necessary”?

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 07:17 PM PDT

Source: Nan Yang San Pau


Amendments passed after five-hour debate

Posted: 06 Oct 2011 11:55 PM PDT

Free Malaysia Today

It was close to midnight when the Dewan Rakyat passed the controversial amendments to the Employment Act.

KUALA LUMPUR: The Dewan Rakyat passed the controversial amendments to the Employment Act late last night despite strong protests from opposition lawmakers and unionists.

The opponents claimed that the changes would expose contract workers to abuse.

Waves of protest did not deter the government from tabling the second reading of the Bill after having to postpone it twice in the past.

Critics claimed that the amendments were drawn up at the behest of multinational corporations and potential investors and deliberately designed to empower employers to employ workers on fixed-term contracts for as long as they wanted to.

The Malaysian Trades Unions Congress (MTUC) had highlighted the fact that once the amendments were passed, "employers would be permitted to impose unreasonable working hours, change weekly rest days as they please", in effect requiring women workers to work at night.

During the debate on the Bill, MPs Abdullah Sani (PKR-Hulu Selangor) and Charles Santiago (DAP-Klang) argued that the changes would promote outsourcing and this was "illegal" as middlemen who subcontract work cannot be considered employers.

Santiago pointed out that if outsourcing companies were allowed to be employers, workers would not be able to claim benefits from the principal company and would have to pay out of their own pockets for medical care and other benefits.

Add to the workers' woes

Meanwhile, Abdullah said the Bill would only add to the woes faced by the workers, who are already suffering from lack of sufficient or "efficient" protection against abuses.

"This change cannot and must not take place. If this Dewan Rakyat wants to protect workers then it must not allow the Bill to pass," he added

Human Resources Minister Dr S Subramaniam, who tabled the Amendment Bill himself yesterday, denied the accusation and maintained that the changes were made to serve and protect workers.

He also said the changes were made after prior consultation with all "stakeholders" although unionists claimed that such meetings were mere political gimmicks.

The debate on the Amendment Bill raged on for five hours and was passed close to midnight.

In an immediate reaction, opposition leaders expressed disappointment over the manner in which the amendments were rushed through but vowed to fight through other means.


UCAPAN BELANJAWAN PAKATAN RAKYAT 2012 – KESEJAHTERAAN UNTUK SEMUA

Posted: 06 Oct 2011 11:46 PM PDT

UCAPAN BELANJAWAN PAKATAN RAKYAT 2012











MY VOICE FOR NATION

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 01:02 PM PDT

MY VOICE FOR NATION


Employment bill erodes the rights of workers

Posted: 06 Oct 2011 08:24 PM PDT

Philosophy Politics Economics

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 09:47 AM PDT

Philosophy Politics Economics


Government Must Not Pay RM0.50 To Send Bills Via Email

Posted: 06 Oct 2011 09:03 AM PDT

We view with concern the announcement made by Tricubes Bhd that 4 government agencies have been approached to adopt the MyEmail system and 2 agencies are commencing pilot projects with the company. The agencies which have been approached are the Royal Malaysian Police (PDRM), Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur (DBKL), Road Transport Department (JPJ) and the Employees Provident Fund (EPF).

We have no objection to government agencies negotiating with any commercial companies to provide better and more efficient services to the public.

However, we are duly worried when the Government starts to use tax-payers' monies to pay for services which are either unnecessary or excessive.

Tricubes CEO, Khairun Zainal Mokhtar has reiterated that He added that "each bill sent via myemail be charged 50 sen to the agency" while normal emails will not be charged.

We would like to reiterate our position in the strongest possible terms our objections to Government agencies paying a single sen for any bills delivered via email. If our local and foreign banks, as well as other utility operators in the country can send my statements and bills to me via normal Yahoo or Gmail accounts, there is absolutely no reason at all for Government agencies to be delivering emails via service providers that charge anything for its use.

We would like to warn that any agency signing agreements to make payments for emails delivered borne by the tax-payers will be referred to the Parliament's Public Accounts Committee to answer for its decision and provide full details on the terms and conditions agreed to in the service contract.

This objection is not aimed against private innovative enterprises but to prevent parties from manipulating exclusive positions and restrictive government concessions from profiting either via rent-seeking or the sheer ignorance of our agencies.

Pengikut